I applied through other source. The process took 3 days. I interviewed at Merkle in July 2009
Interview
After several phone screens & a day of interviewing & presenting, I was told I really impressed them & they'd like to move forward & would contact me in 2-4 wks. They said I would be an excellent fit. But they never called back. After waiting the four mark period, I tried to get in touch via phone/email since they made it seem they wanted to bring me on board. They ignored any correspondence thereafter. While it is not uncommon for companies to change their mind, it is very uncommon to disappear completely when high level of interest is expressed. The courteous thing to do would've been to at least communicate the needs had changed. Found the whole experience very unprofessional. I wouldn't recommend working in a place like that. If this is how they treat people before they've even started, it's a bad sign.
I applied online. I interviewed at Merkle (New York, NY) in Apr 2019
Interview
Fairly straight forward process -
1) Initial Phone Screening
2) Phone Interview with hiring manager
3) In-Person Interviews
4) One final presentation
Overall, the interview process was not super overwhelming but rather conversational and very informative.
Interview questions [1]
Question 1
Describe your experience with difficult clients and how you kept them satisfied?
I applied online. The process took 3 days. I interviewed at Merkle in Oct 2018
Interview
Applied through a website called simplyhired. As has been the new norm with all applications- answered "Yes" for the question- "Will you now or in future require sponsorship?". Despite answering "Yes", I miraculously got an email from a recruiter to set up an initial conversation. Then I reviewed some interviews on glassdoor and found that Merkle Inc.'s recruiters ended conversations within a few minutes of the phone call as soon as they heard "Visa transfer". So I was confused if this recruiter missed my response in the questionnaire or I just got lucky and they indeed transfer visas. The recruiter promptly called at the scheduled time to discuss my experience and we had a great 30 min conversation. My experience was a good fit for the position in question, and we agreed on a few next steps. Just before concluding, came the godforsaken question. Everything went downhill from there. Here's the script I got - "Owing to federal regulations , Merkle Inc has discontinued visa transfers". I began to imagine like I was on Mars, because on planet earth visa transfers in United States are still legal and employees are continuing to work and pay taxes on their income. I refuted the claim and reassured that I am allowed to work with the new employer as soon as the receipt of transfer filings are confirmed. But to no avail . The recruiter maintained that Merkle Inc. has had a long culture of sponsoring candidates and also sponsoring greencards, but the company's HR directive for the past 3 weeks is that they will not be transferring visas because the candidate will not be able to work for over 6 months until the transfer is processed.
When I challenged the validity of this piece of information, the recruiter promised to reconfirm and follow up, but I am not expecting much. Its one thing to overlook my "Yes" on the questionnaire, and a totally different issue that a company that has been sponsoring visas and greencards for a really long time has such flawed immigration knowledge. I wonder which legal Immigration firm is representing them, because they are doing a pathetic job.
I applied online. The process took 6 weeks. I interviewed at Merkle (Charlottesville, VA) in May 2015
Interview
Very Professional. Met with about 4 different people over the course of 4-6 weeks.
All questions involved the current challenges and the needs of the company regarding the respective role. There seemed to be a significant need as the total time between initial resume submission and start date was 8 weeks.
Interview questions [1]
Question 1
Questions were very specific to the needs of the position. Nothing really ambiguous.