Completely online The assessment process felt misaligned with what was actually required to succeed. Candidates are given a dense document and minimal examples, but no real training or feedback loop to understand how scoring decisions are made. The task itself relies heavily on interpreting subjective criteria (e.g. “intent” and “popularity”) without clear calibration, which makes consistent scoring difficult. After multiple attempts, no answers or meaningful feedback were provided, so there’s no way to learn or improve. Overall, it feels less like an evaluation of ability and more like a filter for people who can quickly guess the expected scoring model. A more transparent process with better examples and feedback would significantly improve the candidate experience.