Be aware if you are Muslim or pro-Palestine, especially if you are on a visa: the recently hired COO, who spent eight years working for the Israeli Air Force, has a history of sharing Islamophobic social media posts on LinkedIn and Twitter. He has also liked posts celebrating the idea that people who go on Palestine marches should have their visas revoked.
When his hiring was announced, a significant proportion of the company complained. The CEO defended his hiring on the grounds of “diversity of thought” and “meritocracy”.
A few weeks later, the CEO announced the company was transitioning to a "high performing culture", in which people would be expected to work harder, performance reviews would be harsher, etc etc. He appears to be trying to replicate the culture of Amazon or Elon Musk.
The recently submitted four or five star reviews of Accurx characterise people who have posted critical reviews in this way: “the last year has been full of change; some people here have struggled with that and developed a lot of resentment”. This is a misdiagnosis of why people are unhappy. People are unhappy not because of "change" in the abstract, but because of specific, indefensible decisions such as the hiring of the COO.
There are many other bad things to convey, in particular about the CEO, who is out of his depth and cannot let go of micromanaging even the smallest detail - a culture that now permeates the organisation. But the most important thing I want to convey, so you are able to make informed decisions about your own safety, is the past behaviour of the COO and the fact that the CEO thought it was still both acceptable and a good idea to continue with his hire despite it.