Strong team support but poor executive leadership
Pros
The team was genuinely the strongest part of the experience. I worked with smart, supportive people who made difficult days much easier to get through.
Cons
The CEO’s leadership style felt extremely short-sighted, with reactive decision-making that often created more problems than it solved long term. • There was a noticeable lack of accountability at the executive level, especially when poor decisions came from leadership. • Favoritism played a major role in advancement and recognition, which hurt trust across teams. • Employees were expected to “do more with less” constantly because the company refused to properly invest in tools, systems, or infrastructure. • Spending oversight became excessive and counterproductive under leadership. Even basic operational purchases like €20 zip tie turned into an unnecessary CEO approval process.