Asce Reviews

3.4

68% would recommend to a friend

(85 total reviews)
avatar

Thomas W. Smith III

76% approve of CEO

56% positive business outlook

Asce has an employee rating of 3.4 out of 5 stars, based on 85 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have a good working experience there. The Asce employee rating is in line with the average (within 1 standard deviation) for employers within the Management and consulting industry (3.7 stars).

Reviews by job title

85 reviews
1.0
25 Apr 2017

Good Association, Horrible Leadership!

Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

ASCE is very flexible and most of the people are good and easy to work with.

Cons

ASCE is top heavy and has little to no care for their low level employees. The Director/Manager to employee ratio is unheard of and their focus is not employee worth building, but lining the pockets of the executives and directors. The leadership in some of the departments is very poor. Years ago I would have recommended anyone to work there, but today, if I was in employee, I would campaign a walkout boycott.

1.0
24 Sept 2016
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Those employees who were civil engineers themselves and who worked closely with others in the field, such as the Institute staff, were general very bright people who were committed to their profession and worked hard to advance civil engineering and to benefit society. Work-life balance was also pretty good. Projects generally proceeded at a leisurely pace, the work tended not to be overly demanding or to require working extended hours, and managers were usually flexible about vacation plans or working remotely.

Cons

Management of the organization was incomprehensibly bad, from the CEO on down to the lowest-level supervisors. The CEO at the time I was there was a buffoon whom everyone laughed at behind his back. Most departments heads were unqualified and incompetent, often wasting time by re-inventing the wheel instead of just looking at what other companies were doing and building upon their successes and best practices. Petty infighting, interdepartmental vendettas, and backstabbing of colleagues was common. For example, the CTO and heads of membership and publications hated each other and talked trash about each other behind their backs. As a result, membership and publications would attempt to work around the technology department and engage vendors independently for their projects, but lacking any sort of understanding of what they were getting into were often taken advantage of and ultimately unsuccessful. For his part the CTO enjoyed sowing conflict within his own department by having different employees work independently on the same task without letting them know he was doing this, and then expressing shock at the chaos and negativity that ensued once staff learned they were working at cross purposes. Rather that recognizing the true cause of dysfunction management continuously tinkered with the organizational structure, inventing convoluted forms of matrix reporting that made no sense whatsoever. Salaries for upper management and technical staff was decent but for most worker pay was quite low with few opportunities for advancement, success being rewarded with ridiculous plastic trinkets rather than meaningful compensation or promotion. I saw many of the more competent employees driven out by all the management BS, leaving the least qualified staff behind to keep the lights on.

2.0
16 July 2019
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Lots of really friendly people here. Good benefits. You get to work with some incredibly passionate volunteers.

Cons

No emphasis or commitment to deadlines, plans, or timelines. Major undertakings are decided at a whom without proper planning, or even assessing if you have the resources for such an undertaking. Little oversight over management, resulting in pretty negative sub-cultures and silos in the company. Tenured management can be entrenched in their ways, and obstruct innovation. Managers can make or break your experience at ASCE -- make sure you can work productively with yours. Operations are dictated by the egos of "VIP members," who will often bog down operations with unreasonable requests that do not contribute to the Society or profession, but are accommodated by ASCE nonetheless. Office is VERY dark. Minimal natural light. Very bright and intense artificial lighting Minimal upward mobility.

Viewing 1 - 3 of 85 Reviews

Glassdoor has 88 Asce reviews submitted anonymously by Asce employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if Asce is right for you.