Aurizon Reviews

Overall, most managers were more interested in gouging the company for their own benefits rather than determining what would be in the businesses best interests. Poorly run project teams, with no direction or decision making from key managers (mostly because they were playing polictical games of getting themselves noticed by the EVPs and CEO). CEO actively engaged on diversity debate, but allowed misogynistic managers to implement program. Most successful managers within business were poor on execution and bold on promises.

- Employees insecure about job as there are always organisational changes that can make your role redundant. This is to remain competitive in the market. Changes are planned at a high level that tasks on the ground does not get done or remaining staff gets overload. - Business processes are immature, relying on relationships, informal arrangements and manual workaround. Initiatives are in place to address this, but with staff attrition due to organisational changes and inadequate resources for robust processes management, it will take time to reach maturity. - No known plan at staff level about plans to upskill people for the coming digitalisation of processes.