employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

California State Auditor

Engaged employer

California State Auditor Reviews

3.2

42% would recommend to a friend

(28 total reviews)

Grant Parks

Not enough data to show CEO approval

33% positive business outlook

California State Auditor has an employee rating of 3.2 out of 5 stars, based on 28 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have a good working experience there. The California State Auditor employee rating is in line with the average (within 1 standard deviation) for employers within the Government and public administration industry (3.6 stars).

Reviews by job title

28 reviews
2.0
26 Dec 2020

Toxic Work Culture

Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

The Auditor's Office offers challenging and diverse work assignments for audit staff, great benefits, and a highly valuable work experience. Audit assignments generally last six to nine months, and staff are then assigned to new audit topics with new supervisors and new audit teams. This arrangement enables audit staff members to work on a range of high-profile policy issues and gain a wide breadth of experience.

Cons

The office has a highly toxic culture perpetuated by upper management. Management has a single-minded focus on publishing hard-hitting audit reports that are hyper-critical of the departments and programs being audited. Audit teams face extreme pressure to uncover hard-hitting findings, and this pressure results in a highly negative, fear-based work environment. Audit principals and supervisors are often fearful of taking responsibility for audit mishaps, and instead assign blame to staff members in overly critical performance reviews. The pressure to identify hard-hitting findings also drives audit teams to work extreme amounts of overtime, sometimes for months on end. Although the office has implemented a new training program, supervisors often do not adequately guide or train staff members. Many supervisors are rude and indifferent to staff, and only reprimand staff for doing something wrong after the fact. Most members of management (including upper management) do not care about cultivating or developing staff; instead, they see staff as replaceable cogs in a machine. As a result, turnover is incredibly high among audit staff. The office has cycled through literally hundreds of audit staff over the years, and it is unusual for staff to last more than 2-3 years before quitting. Upper management also retaliates swiftly against those who speak out against its practices or defy their rules. Although several members of upper management like to cultivate new staff for the sake of gaining loyalty, they will quickly reject anyone who raise concerns relating to staff turnover or office governance. In addition, staff have been harshly punished for defying basic office protocol; for example, one staff member was fired for adding her gender pronouns to her standardized email signature plate. If you want to succeed as an auditor here, you need to work hard, and only speak up if you have an audit finding. Do not speak out against management, at least until management changes. If you can handle a couple of years working here, I would recommend securing some good references and then get out. The work experience will speak well for you, but your sanity and well-being are not worth staying here for the long term.

2.0
8 Oct 2020
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Impactful work on meaningful government policy. Great benefits. Smart, dedicated staff. The Auditors produces quality reports and has done a great job of improving the reach and audience of those reports. This work often changes the conversation and drives it forward on issue that have serious impacts on Californians.

Cons

The turnover rate of over 40% (about 4x that of a normal office) really says it all, and that is with staff having great benefits and job security. The main reason for this is tone from the top. Executive management has created an us-versus-them, fear-based culture wherein staff that start as motivated and passionate quickly realize that to excel it is much more important not to make a mistake than it is to take risks that would push the policy conversation forward. While executive management talks a big game about how much they want staff input and ownership within the organization, this quickly falls apart as soon as they get input they don’t agree with. Those that bring up that input are frequently retaliated against. On the flip side of that coin, management also has a strong system of favoritism. The job is infinitely more high stress than it needs to be due to gospel-like adherence to arbitrary timelines and often poor planning on the part of supervisors. Almost without exception, every staff member I have heard of that left the office has been much happier for it. This is certainly true of me.

4.0
11 May 2010
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

-Well respected organization in state government -You get to audit people, which can be fun for the short interviews you do conduct -Some opportunities for travel throughout the state -Promotions come over time for most, not just the high achievers -State job with lots of flexibility for time off -Generally good work/life balance -Relatively small size (~150 employees) means everybody knows everybody -Well educated and intellectual work force -Many auditors under 30 makes for a good social group -Promotions to management can come in 3-4 years for most who stick around -Promotions to more senior management (just more pay) can continue after that point each year -Good experience for accountants looking to get their CPA with attest experience -Hire a large number of recent college grads with little/no experience and provided training -Exposed to high level managers at the BSA and as auditees -Good place to jump start a career with the state due to fast ability to promote compared to some other state agencies -Relatively easy to transfer to other state agencies due to breadth of state experience gained and high reputation of the BSA with other state agencies -Good foundation for law school

Cons

-Projects can require a significant amount of overtime -Projects vary from the extremely mundane to the slightly interesting -Ability to promote depends in large part on job assignments and supervisors -Much of the work conducted by staff level employees is simple grunt-work (scanning and uploading documents, reviewing simple spreadsheets, documenting simple processes in word) -Job skills not seen as highly transferable outside of auditing or government/policy work by some future employers -While half of staff are "accountants", financial audit work is very non-technical from an accounting perspective, does not provide practical accounting experience or knowledge (for example many non-accountants also work on the financial audit with success)

Viewing 1 - 3 of 28 Reviews

Glassdoor has 29 California State Auditor reviews submitted anonymously by California State Auditor employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if California State Auditor is right for you.