employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

Centre for Liveable Cities

Is this your company?

Centre for Liveable Cities Reviews

2.4

21% would recommend to a friend

(29 total reviews)

10% positive business outlook

Centre for Liveable Cities has an employee rating of 2.4 out of 5 stars, based on 29 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have an average working experience there.

Reviews by job title

29 reviews
1.0
1 Aug 2024
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Eye-opening to see the extent of a hostile work environment firsthand

Cons

Unfortunately, many of the previous reviews are accurate regarding the toxic atmosphere driven by ineffective management and communication. There is lack of clear direction often leads to confusion among employees, which can be frustrating. There appears to be a culture that fosters competition rather than collaboration, which negatively impacts team dynamics. Additionally, favouritism is prevalent, contributing to divisions within teams, and an intentional effort to pit employees against one another. This undermines professional relationships and detracts from a respectful workplace. The atmosphere is passive-aggressive, complicating efforts to work effectively and impacting overall morale. Office politics also present a significant challenge, with some colleagues who seem more focused on undermining others than on fostering collaboration. This environment hinders meaningful professional development, as navigating these interpersonal dynamics often takes precedence over productive work. The overarching function of this department within the Ministry of National Development seems unclear and redundant. Potential employees should carefully consider these dynamics before joining.

4.0
12 June 2024
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Supportive team mates Atmosphere is professional and sometimes caring Exciting projects

Cons

Very long hours during high key periods. Work can be non-stop for weeks Can be chaotic and disruptive for "slow and steady" types

1.0
27 May 2024
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

- Vision of organisation to enhance liveability and sustainability means that projects are meant to be collaborative, consultative, dynamic, and involves team members from various fields - there is thus many potential learning opportunities (but see cons] - Strong international networks with city majors, consultancy directors, academics, business leaders etc. can be a stepping stone for staff who are able to leverage on it - Open-minded, curious, collaborative colleague at the staff-level from different backgrounds provides exposure to different perspectives, methods, and concepts of liveability, and finding out how that can be integrated to solve today's and future urban challenges - Assured standard bonuses, increments, staff benefits such as leave and MCs, training courses etc. They will not undercut you on these.

Cons

- Lacking in direction & subject expertise at top management level, yet relunctance to listen to staff's perspectives and inputs, thereby not utlising the staffs' strengths well. This results in a lot of inefficiency and repeated work - Lacking guidance and templates of basic yet essential processes integral to government procedures, resulting much time spent on administrative matters instead of knowledge creation/ management - Lacking awareness of overall contributions to the bigger, parent ministry/government causes a lot of workplan and organisational changes, breeding much uncertainty and frustation over incomplete works; this also undermines learning opportunities - HR is severely understaffed, resulting in many backlogs in even simple requests such as claims. Non-transparent processes also makes it difficult to discuss HR or career development matters. - Unclear, vague roles of each department causes confusion of what each does, sometimes pushing around of 'smaller tasks' (which accumulates], overloading (usually at managerial level] and underloading particular individuals. - While not as bad as the larger, older departments, hierarchial and bureaucratic culture still exists. This is more of a wider structural problem rather than a company-specific problem. - Staff morale is low due to the many years of high turnover, repeated changes in project scope and deliverables, and depending on who you are working under: gaslighting, expectation to mindread, managing a panicked/stressed supervisor, being micromanaged, being expected to work or reply texts after-hours, being thrown under the bus when subjected to another leaders' scrutiny etc.

Viewing 1 - 3 of 29 Reviews

Glassdoor has 56 Centre for Liveable Cities reviews submitted anonymously by Centre for Liveable Cities employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if Centre for Liveable Cities is right for you.