Dallas Zoo Reviews

3.9

80% would recommend to a friend

(71 total reviews)
avatar

Gregg Hudson

94% approve of CEO

57% positive business outlook

Dallas Zoo has an employee rating of 3.9 out of 5 stars, based on 71 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have a good working experience there. The Dallas Zoo employee rating is in line with the average (within 1 standard deviation) for employers within the Arts, entertainment and recreation industry (3.9 stars).

Reviews by job title

71 reviews
1.0
12 Jan 2022

Dumpster Fire

Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Your animals, and the camaraderie between you and your coworkers because everyone is miserable together.

Cons

- You are not respected. - You are replaceable. - You are not listened to when upper management makes decisions about your animals (the ones you work with every day) that they know nothing about. - HR sides with upper management, they don't listen to your concerns. - Pay is extremely low, especially when you're doing the job of 5 people. - They aren't hiring/replacing positions of people who leave, you're just expected to make up for that missing person. - The zoo chooses to pay 6 figure salaries to upper management, but "can't afford" basic necessities to care for the animals, i.e. shade, proper heating in winter, camera systems, safe containment, etc. - Favoritism and bullying from the top level - Not being able to have the resources to properly care for the animals that you love - Not enough space for the animals - Not enough time to dedicate to the animals because you are being stretched so thin (mostly a post-covid issue) - People who make big mistakes aren't held accountable, i.e. letting an animal out - The zoo likes to act like it's transparent, but it's not. Several animal deaths not told to the public (the public only knew about the 3 giraffe deaths because it was leaked to the news, they didn't include the bongo, the zebra, etc.) The baby tigers were pulled away from their mother - that reason about her not producing milk is not the true reason. Staff continuously bring aggression concerns to management, but are ignored, and then more animals are injured/killed. This is a very, very toxic zoo. If you take animal care and conservation seriously, steer clear of this "organization."

1.0
12 Feb 2020
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Where else can you walk 100 feet and see to de stress after a long meeting.

Cons

Management makes decisions without consulting staff, vs making decisions based on staff feedback. Leadership sit on campus but nearly completely disconnected from those that actual do the work of running the zoo and yet often make operational changes to daily operations with no idea of if it will work in piratical approach. Be prepared to take a pay cut if you are a skilled professional. The zoo will not pay staff what they are worth. If you cost too much they will outsource to a vendor, monorail, IT, graphics, marketing etc. Hostile environment, they have fired people after dissolving their department, or while on medical leave (non fmla) without the courtesy of discussing it with them Staff turnover is 60% a year for most area's of the park. Expect to work with entry level people at every management level of the org, there are a few amazing directors, but they are few and far between. Expect countless meetings where one person dominates the meeting, no one else can say anything, and to have your ideas and creativity shot down. Don't expect to be recognized when a change you implement saves millions of dollars for the org, instead expect more work, no bonus, and if you're lucky a 3% raise. Management is discouraged from providing 5 star ratings on mid and yearly reviews, even if you're the top performer in your department.

2.0
20 Nov 2016

Horticulture Dept

Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Large facility: about 110 acres plus a greenhouse, exposure to many kinds of plants and environments, opportunity to learn new plants and techniques,

Cons

The Zoo is under a consent decree from the Environmental Protection Agency but they only pretended to comply with it. I was asked to falsify EPA reports, ROUND UP herbicide is used next to the flamingo pond instead of hand weeding, the drains and filters for stormwater runoff into the watershed were deplorable. Contamination occurred on a daily basis. You are coached on what to tell the City of Dallas auditors. Not trained on required procedures, just coached on how to answer the auditors' questions. The auditors also always schedule their visits shortly after the birth of cute animals. They are given private visits with the latest baby giraffe or whatever and kept distracted by it for as long as possible. This is a well known "thing" at the Zoo. It is my opinion there has not been a thorough audit at the Zoo in many years, or they would have seen the same violations I noticed. As a city taxpayer I do not appreciate this. A work order system is used which is very easy to game. Many, many times I would ask a crew leader as long as we were in a location completing a task on a work order and had all the tools with us if we should do something else in that area or an adjacent area that also CLEARLY needed doing. The answer would always, always, always be -- no only do what is on the work order. Eventually I realized the crew leaders get their brownie points not by making the Zoo look better but by making work order reports look better. Which explains why the "gardens" at the Zoo look as bad as they do. I am a resident of Dallas and consider the poor state of the display gardens at the Zoo to be an embarrassment to the entire Dallas Park system.

Viewing 1 - 3 of 71 Reviews

Glassdoor has 84 Dallas Zoo reviews submitted anonymously by Dallas Zoo employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if Dallas Zoo is right for you.