employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

Denver Human Services

Is this your company?

Denver Human Services Reviews

2.5

17% would recommend to a friend

(36 total reviews)
avatar

Michelle Barnes

Not enough data to show CEO approval

16% positive business outlook

Denver Human Services has an employee rating of 2.5 out of 5 stars, based on 36 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have an average working experience there. The Denver Human Services employee rating is 31% below average for employers within the Government and public administration industry (3.6 stars).

Reviews by job title

36 reviews
1.0
7 Nov 2017
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Doing work that can help people.

Cons

Micromanagement by data and technology team manager. Lack of knowledge of modern programming concepts. Unfortunate unwillingness to listen to suggestions of staff. Poor people skills of leadership. Manager that is arrogant and condescending to staff. Developers are treated like grunts as opposed to valuable resources of the organization. By this I mean that opinions and suggestions will not be heard. Timelines will be dictated without consultation of contributing members. Failed decisions by management are routinely blamed on development staff. If you are a developer or designer looking for a good opportunity to work in IT, best to look any other place than DHS technology team. There are many good people and managers at DHS, but the technology team is a bad environment. You will not be placed in a position to succeed. You will have any expertise you bring to the team be doubted for no reason. Rigid rules and ever changing whims of the leader are the daily norms.

1.0
9 July 2018

Keep looking

Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Holidays off Potential to help a lot of people who really need it

Cons

Advancement is based solely on political maneuvering. Experience, seniority and even the basic abilities to do the job are not factored into promotional opportunities. HR and management are so concerned with turnover that they will try to keep EVERYONE. Except for attendance issues, nobody is terminated. The worst thing they'll do is move the problem employee around to fail somewhere else. More likely, management will just tolerate them and let them motor along for the next few decades. Workers are required to bend over backwards to help clients who refuse to help themselves (on any level), but if that worker wants a temporary schedule change or would like to move cubicles, forget it! Security is a joke. Cars have been broken into while parked in the mandatory employee parking garage (of course there's a fee)/. The quiet understanding is the agency will do something as soon as there's a tragedy, not a minute before. Management knows the answers it has to give to higher-up (the mayor, the state etc). They also fail to act on those answers so there's culture of hypocrisy that is exhausting. They are constantly soliciting opinions and advice from the front line staff. That's a good thing until you realize they ignore the data given and do whatever they want anyway. The surveys are just a task for them to say they did, not tools for gathering information. There is no accountability. If someone does poor work on something, you're expected to clean it up. With very few exceptions, the person who did the poor work will never be told it happened, let alone coached on any level. This is government bureaucracy at its worst. Higher-ups who do nothing add levels of management underneath them to do nothing, who hire support staff to help them do nothing. Fear of responsibility, added to mandatory federal guidelines and local, arbitrary rules mean getting anything done is almost impossible. Longevity means those employees are too incompetent to get a job somewhere else. Almost anyone worth a damn realizes they want to be somewhere where their accomplishments and abilities are recognized and rewarded. 20 year veteran staff are easily the worst performers.

2.0
15 Apr 2019

Great Cause but Be Careful

Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

The mission and purpose of the agency is great, as the agency serves many people with needs. The salaries are competitive as are the benefits. The Mayor seems to be a genuinely good person, and the current agency director has many of the right ideas to improve the morale (which historically has been poor). They have some good ideas currently such as their #BeHuman campaign, and some really excellent training for supervisors.

Cons

There is virtually a complete lack of minority representation in the highest level positions, in spite of the director being a minority (the pictures in the entry hallway of the executive staff reveal all white people, and I am one myself). Some people in the upper management follow the guiding principles, while others appear to have no hesitation to not do so (such as lying about employees in order to cover their own mistakes). This has produced a fear based culture. When people speak up to do the right thing, like other places with an unhealthy culture, it usually turns out badly for the employee. Although the director truly seems like a good person, he will not talk to people about these issues directly as those below him (including the lawyers and HR department) appear to prevent access to him. I have witnessed upper management and the HR department lie about good staff, harming their reputations, while trying to cover for themselves. Thus, until this is dealt with, the place is a really poor and emotionally unsafe place to work.

Viewing 1 - 3 of 36 Reviews

Glassdoor has 40 Denver Human Services reviews submitted anonymously by Denver Human Services employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if Denver Human Services is right for you.