DoorFeed Reviews

1.0

0% would recommend to a friend

(6 total reviews)

Reviews by job title

6 reviews
1.0
5 Aug 2025
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

The people (not including senior management): I had the pleasure of working with truly wonderful, intelligent, and driven colleagues. Collaboration felt natural there was no judgment, just a shared sense of purpose and a genuine team spirit. It made day to day work not only productive but genuinely enjoyable. My engineering manager: Out of all the engineering managers I’ve worked with, he stood out as exceptional. What truly set him apart was his empathy and his ability to lead without judgment. That kind of leadership is rare especially in the fast paced, high pressure environment we were in. His support made a real difference and created a safe, motivating space to do great work.

Cons

The senior management: Some individuals in management created unnecessary pressure around deliverables, often pushing for unrealistic timelines. This contributed to a stressful environment that could have been avoided with better planning and communication. Work life balance: There was very little balance. Long hours were the norm, not the exception, and the expectation to be constantly available made it hard to maintain any separation between work and personal life. Rigid office policy: A strict 5 day a week in office requirement offered no flexibility, which felt outdated and disconnected from modern work culture especially in a role that could easily support remote or hybrid work. Lack of benefits: There were no meaningful benefits offered to support employee well being or development. Low compensation: Pay was below market average, particularly when factoring in the long hours and high expectations. High turnover: Employee churn was noticeably high, which impacted team stability and morale.

1.0
30 July 2025
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Wework is a nice place to work

Cons

- Lack of flexibility – no remote work culture or work-life balance - CEO and leadership style created a top-down, unsupportive environment - “People First” was more of a buzzword than an actual value - Annual reviews reduced individuals to numbers, which hurt morale - Poor communication and lack of transparency from leadership - Culture focused on optics and short-term wins, not long-term growth or employee wellbeing - No real investment in employee development or retention

1.0
18 Jan 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

- The team is friendly enough

Cons

- The CEO regularly approaches employees in the middle of the day with new requests and immediately asks when they will be completed. There is effectively no real time management, project management, or task prioritisation. While tools like Jira are used, they are meaningless in practice because priorities are constantly overridden by ad-hoc demands from the CEO, usually marked as “ASAP.” Everything he asks for is treated as immediately critical, regardless of existing commitments. This creates constant disruption and makes it impossible to plan or deliver work properly. - The company is so poorly organised that teams are confused and isolated. People work in silos, often unaware of what others are building, leading to duplicated effort and disconnected solutions rather than genuine collaboration. - The CEO frequently promotes a “ship at 80%”, a DoorFeed value. In practice, this translates to pushing out poorly written, fragile code that may work briefly but is not resilient or maintainable. Without solid engineering processes, the entire platform is built on a weak foundation, and these shortcuts compound over time. - The CEO is an AI evangelist and believes the product should be heavily AI-driven from the outset. Engineers are pushed to implement AI features despite the fact that basic engineering principles, data quality, and system reliability have not been properly established. As a result, AI is treated as a silver bullet rather than a tool, and is layered on top of an already unstable system. - Despite being around for 4–5 years, DoorFeed still operates like an early-stage startup. The product has not matured in any meaningful way. Clients struggle to see tangible value from the platform because it is unreliable and, in many areas, fundamentally broken. This makes it difficult to retain customers or build long-term trust, and raises serious questions about the company’s direction and viability.

Viewing 1 - 3 of 6 Reviews

Glassdoor has 8 DoorFeed reviews submitted anonymously by DoorFeed employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if DoorFeed is right for you.