Eastside Reviews

3.0

46% would recommend to a friend

(49 total reviews)

Jason Stokes

54% approve of CEO

42% positive business outlook

Eastside has an employee rating of 3.0 out of 5 stars, based on 49 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have an average working experience there. The Eastside employee rating is in line with the average (within 1 standard deviation) for employers within the Media and communication industry (3.7 stars).

Reviews by job title

49 reviews
1.0
10 Feb 2022
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

It's just another workplace to put on the CV.

Cons

First and foremost, the positive reviews are written by those who: 1) Haven't been at ESC long enough to realize how bad it is. They're looking through rose tinted glasses 2) Have been there for so long, they feel stuck there and need to stay on the CEO/COO/CMOs good side 3) Have been written by those who have been threatened to write a good review. This is not acceptable, and anyone with a brain can decipher which reviews are legitimate or not. The CEO is incredibly toxic, and their views have rubbed off on the CMO + COO. The people at the top don't even do their job. They are not qualified to have those types of titles. The people who you learn from are your fellow colleagues in the same boat. These are the people who help you succeed and learn, not the people at the top. These "Officers" are just here to increase their pay-check every month, and it's very clear to see their motives. It's such a shame as this could be a fantastic agency, but the greed gets in the way. People are desperate to get out, and it shows when you talk to being on a one to one basis. If there was a proper HR system in place, this would get caught earlier, and people would feel less inclined to resent their workplace.

1.0
29 July 2024
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Some great employees who are good at their job.

Cons

I worked at Eastside Co for just under 8 years. I thought it would be useful to share my experiences and observations for potential employees, clients or suppliers to take into account before making a decision about working with the agency. 1. Late payment of wages: The company frequently pays staff late - sometimes a day, but in some cases up to a week. During my time there I was paid late at least 15 times. Often they wouldn’t notify staff if their wages weren’t going to be paid - payday would just come and go, and employees would be left without any money. On payday at the end of November 2023, I happened to check my bank account in the evening and noticed I’d not been paid. I was fortunate enough to be able to make financial arrangements so my mortgage payment and bills didn’t fail. The leadership team just never mentioned or even acknowledged it. 2. Non payment of employer and employee pension contributions: For a period of over 2 years, the company did not pay the employer contributions to the staff pensions. Not only this, but pension contributions were deducted from employees’ wages and not paid into the pension scheme. Staff were made aware of this when we received letters from the pension company notifying us of the missing payments, and the fact that the agency had been reported to the Pensions Regulator. This was never acknowledged by ESC until the staff forced the issue. Eventually some payments were reimbursed in May 2024. We believed the situation was resolved but staff received a further letter from the pension company last week, notifying us that ESC has been reported to the Pensions Regulator again, for non-payment of pensions for March 2024. They have also failed to pay staff pensions for April, May and June 2024. The situation remains unresolved. 3. Late payment and non-payment of redundancy money: There have been several rounds of redundancies in the last 3 years or so. I was one of the employees to leave during the most recent round of redundancies. Two weeks before my redundancy payment was due (as agreed in writing), I (and several others who were going through the same process) received an email from the HR Director to inform us that the agency had made the decision to delay the payment by a month. This money is intended to provide financial support while looking for a new job, and not everyone who received this message had found new employment at that point. While I received the money the following month, I know some people are yet to receive it, some 3 months later. 4. Failure to pay suppliers: I worked alongside suppliers including a PR agency and a web development company. The PR company had a lot of trouble getting payment for their services, only receiving it after chasing for months, and after having been told repeatedly that they had been paid when they hadn't. The web development company never received their payment - after chasing the money for 6 months, ESC went into administration at the end of 2023. It was acquired out of administration in a pre-pack deal (this is in the public domain). I would welcome a response from the agency to challenge, explain or apologise for any of the above points.

1.0
17 Mar 2023
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Nice office (but bad location) Some very talented individuals

Cons

- Inexperienced & arrogant managers, frustration often taken out on their staff - CEO held a company meeting soon after I started. During the meeting he boasted about how much money the company was making and joked that about a third of staff was unnecessary. Soon after this he used company money to go on an around the world holiday which was described as a ‘business trip’ and then struggled to pay his staff on time for the following two months. - Track record over years of late or forgotten salary payments with no explanation or apology. - CEO has a very bad temper and can become verbally and physically aggressive towards staff. - CTO is very resistant to change and does not follow most modern development practices although he doesn’t seem to mind or care which practices team members use. - CTO is completely unqualified for his position and only seems capable of writing spaghetti code. - CTO operates as CTO, lead developer and back-end team lead and will not delegate tasks. - CTO once spent 20 minutes gleefully showing everyone in the office a website that sold novelty sex toys because of how ‘weird’ they were. Staff are often promised pay rises or promotions and are then strung along with no resolution. - HR department is worse than useless. Often obstructive, will not reply to messages or emails. Will undermine other directors and make you question who your line manager actually is. - Lack of support given to junior members of staff and very little on boarding or training.

Viewing 1 - 3 of 49 Reviews

Glassdoor has 53 Eastside reviews submitted anonymously by Eastside employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if Eastside is right for you.