Elevate (DC) Reviews

2.6

24% would recommend to a friend

(53 total reviews)
avatar

Alayna Buckner

37% approve of CEO

33% positive business outlook

Elevate (DC) has an employee rating of 2.6 out of 5 stars, based on 53 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have an average working experience there.

Reviews by job title

53 reviews
2.0
1 June 2018
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

* Excellent clients working toward worthy causes. The best part of this job is the clients you get to work with. * Team-oriented staffing (multiple people per client) allows you to work with many people from different walks of life. You can develop your "team-work" skills by managing professional relationships with many different types of personalities and people. * You will learn to cope with an unmanageable workload, which will make almost any succeeding job seem relatively simple. * Senior staff are very accessible. While their options for easing your concerns are limited, they are genuinely great people who care on a personal level about other employees.

Cons

* The workload balloons to an unmanageable level quickly. Expect to work well over 40 hours per week - much closer to 60 - and weekend work will be frequent. * "100% Remote Office" is code-word for "you are always on-the-clock." There is never a chance to unplug from the job. Taking a single sick day will result in you being VERY far behind on your assignments. * The firm is more focused on client acquisition and retention than staff. Each client has a set workload that is in the contract, and this is almost never enforced; resulting in overworked staff and diminished work quality. * High rate of staff turnover, so once you have learned the ropes you will always be teaching someone else the ropes. Limited stability within your writing teams. * Some of the mid-tier management (i.e. writing team leaders) are not good at managing people. They have been promoted because they write very well, but are lousy managers of people. For instance, if you send a draft back to a writer for a fourth revision, the manager should just do the edits themselves and address the disconnect in a follow-up meeting. The writer has four other clients to write drafts for, and can't do four attempts at a single draft. Some in mid-management seem to take joy in lording over the grant writers. * Very aggressive non-compete which will limit your opportunities to work elsewhere in the non-profit sector in DC.

1.0
14 Mar 2023
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Kind, supportive co-workers; more variety than an in-house development position; less isolated than freelancing

Cons

Please do not ignore the warnings here about the workload for the grant writer position. They'll warn you during the interview process that it's "fast paced" and that the workload is significant, but what they don't admit is that you quite literally cannot accomplish all your tasks within 35 hours per week, which is how many hours you should be working at a full time job with entry-level pay. You'll be writing an average of 4 "drafts" per week, with a "draft" being either a full proposal, a report, or a letter of inquiry. You will also be required to attend 4-5 team meetings per week, 1 supervisor check-in per week, and anywhere from 1-4 meetings per month *per client,* with an average load of 4 clients. Between editing drafts, meetings, conducting mandatory research, doing mandatory professional development, answering emails, I regularly performed about 55 hours of work per week and was often still behind schedule. There's a lot of turnover, and it's almost always very disruptive. The company also is very open and welcoming of complaints and negative feedback. These two things together seemed promising at first, because I figured that the company must be trying to fix things; on one of the teams I was placed on, a client openly expressed frustration that they were getting yet another new writer, so it seemed like it would be in the company's best financial interest to keep turnover low and improve conditions for grant writers. However, I eventually could only conclude that the math has already been done, and burning through grant writers is more profitable than creating bearable conditions. I truly believe that the reason they're so welcoming of grantwriters being open about their conditions is to create the impression that, eventually, conditions might improve, when management knows very well that it won't. I eventually left after about 8 months, and I've never left a job after less than a year before. If you have ADHD or any other disorder that affects executive function, you will not last in this job. Seriously. Don't attempt it. The co-workers I had who struggled with executive function complained on a daily basis that they were underwater, ashamed, guilty, overwhelmed -- it got too demoralizing to even talk to them after awhile. The company clearly relies on the fact that most grant writers are highly intelligent and want to do good, but also disproportionately likely to suffer from low self-esteem, anxiety and depression disorders, imposter syndrome, and compulsive people-pleasing; each writer thinks their overwhelm is their personal failing. When they finally realize it's not, they leave, and the company doesn't have to deal with them anymore. Company gets paid, clients stick around because there's no other option they can afford, and who cares what happens to the writer? I truly hope that eventually Elevate has enough trouble hiring new victims that they take a real look at their business model, but every year there's a fresh crop of 23 year olds with English degrees and no experience with fair working conditions, so I'm not optimistic. My best advice if you're going to work here (other than "please don't") is to do the bare minimum, plan on leaving within a year, and make sure to give at least 30 days' notice, because otherwise they won't pay you for the PTO you rightfully earned.

2.0
4 Sept 2017

Hot Mess

Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

You might be able to learn a few new things. But really there are no perks to working for Elevate.

Cons

Almost everything. Pay sucks. Benefits suck. Having to schedule vacation and Weekends off around their schedule. Extreme micro management. Don't expect to want to stay there more than a year at most.

Viewing 1 - 3 of 53 Reviews

Glassdoor has 55 Elevate (DC) reviews submitted anonymously by Elevate (DC) employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if Elevate (DC) is right for you.