Great Springboard - Anonymous employee 3-D Technology Employee Review

5.0
9 July 2023
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

-Great employee culture -Can get started with little to no experience -Real ACTUAL chance to move forward in the company -Reimbursement for some certifications -Lower/mid management cares and fights for their people

Cons

-Upper Management means well but communicates VERY poorly and has bad organizational skills (cancels company meetings like clockwork almost every time) -Project Management and Executive Leadership tends to not learn lessons between projects or implement new ideas -WAY understaffed

Explore other reviews about 3-D Technology

5.0
29 Oct 2022
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

-They provide a genuine environment for career growth with reimbursement for Continuing Education, career planning/tracking assistance, and growing opportunities to step up to the plate. -Referral Incentive Program that is open to all employees to be rewarded for helping grow clientele. -Yearly Bonuses

Cons

-Onboarding/training was almost non-existent -Field Ops felt stretched thin

2.0
27 Aug 2019
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

The Franklin HQ is in a beautiful location. VP and CEO are nice, pleasant and seem to be hard-working.

Cons

Some context: The company's bread and butter is work done by its field technicians. Looking at the job posting, one would think that the work is technically demanding, requiring an MCSA. The job, however, is not at all technically demanding; it consists mostly of menial labor. It is also from this same labor pool that 3-D Technology source talent for many of the lower functions in HQ. This creates an environment where best practices aren't necessarily followed and overvaluation of rhetoric/loyalty over technical excellence. Example: The company has put in countless man-hours and capital into their proprietary software for less than stellar results. (Note that the scope of the project is something that does not exceed a project you might expect to find in the portfolio of an above-average but not stellar jr. developer.) Much of the failure should be attributed to the fact that the product owner assigned was the sort of person that did not know the difference between agile and waterfall. Stories like this are not uncommon in 3-d. If these stories raise concern, I don't recommend that you work for this company.

7
avatar
3-D Technology Response
6y
Thank you for your review. While we respectfully disagree with some of your comments, we appreciate your feedback. First of all, we do not feel that any of our employees' tasks are "menial", and frankly your comment is insulting to the good, hardworking people employed here. We value all of our resources---at every level--- and try to mentor, empower, and train our more junior employees whenever we feel they may have the ability and desire to advance within our organization. Most highly functioning teams are not made up of cookie cutter people with the exact same skill or ability level...it is through diversity that truly great teams are created. As far as your comments related to our proprietary software development, we used an outside vendor for the bulk of the development. I am not sure what you are referencing, but I do not believe your opinion to be factual and it's certainly not relevant to being employed at 3-D. We are truly sorry you did not find the work here challenging enough. We wish you all the best. Again, thanks for your feedback.
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All