employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

Agilent Technologies

Engaged employer

Agilent is a mixed bag - Senior Software Engineer Agilent Technologies Employee Review

2.0
26 June 2016
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Overall I believe the company solves good and challenging problems. They try to take care of their employees and seem to care about the experience employees have developed over the years. Many employees have worked at Agilent and formerly HP for a long time. Supporting and encouraging long-term employees is one of its greatest strengths. They also seem to support employees moving to different departments/divisions in order to keep advancing in their skills/careers. However, you have to move to Santa Clara for many of these opportunities.

Cons

I think Agilent offers substandard benefits and salary. For salary, it may be highly dependent upon the division or group in which you are employed, however, they do have a standard salary range for every position. Health benefits are substandard as well, expensive or greatly limited depending upon the plan. People that work in Santa Clara complain that it is difficult to compete against Apple, Google, and Facebook. The benefits/salary in comparison seem so far off the mark, I wonder why the people working in Santa Clara (in software development) don't try working at these other places. Almost everything is outsourced. From IT support to most HR functions. In my division there was no way to advance from where I was. I didn't want to move to Santa Clara, so I was stuck.

Explore other reviews about Agilent Technologies

5.0
22 June 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Good teammates, work life balance and salary

Cons

None i could think of

1.0
15 June 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Great products that help scientific researchers

Cons

The enterprise comms dept is awful. A toxic environment marked by instability and burnout. Long‑time employees are pushed out, new hires leave, and the culture is defined by fear rather than collaboration. The core issue is the leadership. Limited enterprise‑level experience and a lack of emotional intelligence have created a culture of micro-managing, reactive decisions, and psychological insecurity. Instead of providing clarity and strategic leadership, the leader fuels confusion, distrust, and exhaustion. The result is a dysfunctional department where morale is low, workloads are unsustainable, and employees feel unsafe speaking up.

8
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All