You've been warned. - Anonymous employee Art.com Employee Review

2.0
27 Aug 2015
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Great product Art.com ATTRACTS talent; plenty of smart, creative people are enticed by the idea of working with the product and there's plenty of POTENTIAL for creative marketing and new technology The benefits package – health, dental, 401k matching, commuter checks, phone reimbursement, product discount – is pretty competitive for a company this size

Cons

There are so many. First off, read the reviews you see here very carefully. Those that come from the NC or OH locations are likely to be very positive, and that's a testament to the leadership of the CSS and Logistics staff. They are excellent, and deserve such reviews, but theirs is a different universe; unless you're applying for a warehouse job or phone support job, disregard them. If you're looking at any position based out of the corporate headquarters in Emeryville, walk away now. C-level leadership is truly abhorrent here. Shockingly so. The entire C-level team has been in place for over a decade. All 50-year old men (makes so much sense for a company with a vastly female customer base). HR exists only to serve the autocrat CEO, who is a certifiable narcissist. A network of former Art.com employees actually get together as a support group to share their horror stories and aid in each other's recovery after having survived years of working with him. The technology here is so behind the times it's laughable. The sites might as well be duct-taped together at this point. Go shopping on Allposters.com and see for yourself. Duct. Tape. The company – literally, an e-commerce company in the 21st Century – actually waited until 2015 to MARGINALLY invest in a social media marketing strategy. They've been without a CMO or even a marketing VP for over a year now and seem shockingly unconcerned. Who's driving the marketing business? Hmm... I bet you can figure it out. There's no strategy at all. Really – none. Some time in Q3, the CEO will look at the most successful "thing" a competitor has done "lately" and then the whole company will have to scramble to replicate it before the end of the fiscal year. There is no vision, nothing inspiring anyone, and all the effort and energy put into a rebrand a few years ago has now fizzled or been squandered away. The people who generated that momentum have all been canned for not contributing enough to the bottom line with their silly creative social things, or read the writing on the wall and packed up and left. Really, just don't. And if for some reason you still do, then don't ever, ever, go to HR about anything. They are not your friend. You've been warned.

Explore other reviews about Art.com

1.0
2 Apr 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Worth noting that the parent company, Trends International, operates with a completely different culture, one built on genuine respect and care for its people. That distinction matters and should not be lost in this review.

Cons

The Chief Digital Officer does not know that Instagram and Facebook are both owned by Meta. That is not a minor knowledge gap for someone in that role. That is a disqualifier. It gets worse. This person largely functions as a puppet for a behind-the-scenes operator who holds real influence without any accountability or relevant e-commerce experience. That operator is herself protected by ownership that is equally disconnected from digital commerce. The result is a chain of unqualified people making consequential decisions while anyone who actually knows the business is sidelined. Under this leadership, Art.com has managed to lose ground in a category it once owned. Consistent revenue decline is the legacy being built here, and the people responsible have faced zero accountability for it. HR cannot be trusted. If you advocate for your team, raise legitimate concerns, or simply refuse to go along with something that is wrong, you will be punished for it. Full stop. There is no advocacy just another example of an unqualified individual in a pivotal role. The toxicity here is not incidental. It is structural and it flows directly from the top.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All