Toxic Environment and Low Pay - Anonymous employee CGFNS Employee Review

1.0
11 Feb 2021
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

The health benefits are good considering the low pay, many mid- level managers and directors care a lot about their employees, regular schedule, they allow most roles to work remotely during COVID

Cons

The high level leadership treats employees terribly and finds any excuse to pay as little as possible. The International Credential Evaluators do the work that is most integral to the business yet they are payed between $15 - $18 an hour even though the role requires at least a bachelor's degree. The "data entry" and customer service roles are much more than that, and are extremely detail oriented and high pressure, but the pay is very low. There is basically no room for career advancement in these jobs no matter how good you are at them, unless you somehow stand out to the CEO. Usually the only ones who are able to be promoted are young and white. When people are promoted from low pay positions, they are usually very over qualified and still end up being underpaid because upper management frames it as doing them a favor. The work environment is very toxic because employees are overworked as much as possible, and upper management are often berated by the CEO in front of other employees. HR is not really functional.

Explore other reviews about CGFNS

5.0
17 Dec 2022
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

CGFNS is leading the Nation in creating a more diverse workforce in healthcare. Opening the doors to global opportunity in travel nursing!

Cons

You need strong communication skills. Being bilingual is a plus.

4.0
16 Mar 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Great pay. Good benefits. CEO is a pleasure to work with and has a great open door policy. The position was enjoyable and appreciated the collaboration of coworkers.

Cons

Direct was not clear from Supervisors and they were always changing the guidelines without advising the employees prior to doing so. Did not seem there was any oversight of how the Supervisors were managing and they needed to do better in that department.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All