employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

Center for Infectious Disease Research

Is this your company?

Shaky Ground - Anonymous employee Center for Infectious Disease Research Employee Review

2.0
6 Apr 2016
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Interesting, thoughtful, meaningful science is attempted.

Cons

Poor, poor management which leads to terrible moral. I couldn't believe the change in environment that I am experiencing in my new position. People are happy, friendly and there is a buzz int the air. I actually like going to work. I really struggled during my final months at CIDR, I hated it. The atmosphere at CIDR feels like a morgue. There is no inspiration, it is really struggling to keep going. From what I hear there are several key people looking to get out of there. They are spending LOTS of money on outreach and communications. In fact there is a rumor that the man in charge of communications has some dirt on one of the board members, that is why he has all the power that he does. Honestly the man is very underwhelming for what they are paying him. And despite all the money they have spent NOTHING has been brought in = big waste of funds. So, my suggestion would be to look elsewhere unless you are desperate.

Explore other reviews about Center for Infectious Disease Research

5.0
4 Sept 2020
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

The people are so genuine and kind, and the work culture stands behind caring for you as an individual. There is room for growth, and plenty of support and resources along the way.

Cons

Nothing that stands out to note!

2.0
8 Mar 2013
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

The overall mission of the institute is a good one. There are many very talented and dedicated people who truly want to change the world for the better, and it's rewarding to get to work with those people.

Cons

The founder of the institute left the role of President on January 1, 2012. Since then it's been a steady slide downhill. The new President seems incapable of leading and tends to make things more about himself than the science (and science is the reason for the institute's existence). There used to be excellent communication from the leadership to "the troops"; that has dried up. It doesn't feel that there is a direction to the institute at this point, and the "leadership" is not inspiring confidence in anyone other than themselves. Their core competency is apparently generating-corporate speak to explain why they aren't at fault for the economic issues the institute is having (all while spending as much as they want on themselves and on new upper-level staff).

4
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All