A once great company to work for now filled with bad habits and poor decision making - Manager Clutch Employee Review

2.0
30 July 2025
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

The CEO is genuinly kind. You can tell he cares a lot. The in office perks were great. There are some kind people who work there. A handful of the people who work there are hard-working, creative problem solvers and extremely smart, so you can learn a lot from them. The benefits were pretty good. The first several years I worked there I felt heard, cared for and respected. Everything we did had the best interest of the stakeholders including the customer. The pay and benefits were competitive and more importantly the autonomy to try new things and grow were rooted in the culture.

Cons

The newer C-suite and senior management that took over in the past two years have no idea what they are doing. These issues boil down to a few things: -Not moving fast enough, despite clamining they are innovative -Not practicing what they preach and not being willing to roll up their sleeves and solve problems -Innability to take responsibility -Being disconnected from employees and unable to manage people. You can read specific examples of these below... These business leaders were constantly talk about how they like to be innovative and move quickly on new projects. They expect those things from their employees, but they are uncreative and they simply recycle the same ideas over and over again trying to paint them a different way, calling that innovation (lead matching turning into PPL and "re-releasing featured listings"). These leaders are slow to act on a changing market, which caused the company to see financial hardships and even though it was their lack of creativity and forward thinking that caused this hardship. They were spared layoffs and instead laid off the hard-working people who were trying to save the business. For example, for over a year, AM teammates and other customer facing teammates had told the leaders that the changes being made to the company's product (in order to increase revenue) was making it much less valuable for our most loyal customers. The leaders charged full steam ahead pretending nothing was wrong until it caused serious damage to the product and brand reputation. In addtion to poor business decisions, the new leadership was incabable of connecting with most of the team and the customers, especially those who teammates who built the company into the powerhouse it once was. For example, on several occations I saw the cheif revenue officer get on calls with customers. On one call that I listned to, I heard him talk poorly about his team. On another call, he was unprepared and did a poor job of supporting the upset customer. Even basic listening skills and empathy were not present on this call. That customer later told their account manager how useless and unhelpful the call was. Since all calls were recorded, I heard several cases where customers were surprised and disappointed when they spoke to the revenue leadership. These leaders did not know how to have a conversation with their employees in a way that felt human. These leaders came off as out of touch with reality both related to modern business culture and making personal connections. For example, one leader talked about his second home and offered a discount code to rent his lakehouse, even as the company was struggling to address business challenges and people weren't getting the bonuses they deserved. The same leader joked about how he drank too much at some team events. One leader did not like when the start of a meeting was kicked off with a Chappell Roan song during the summer. These leaders were extremely clicky and favored the employees who placated them. Lastly, these leaders practiced toxic positivity. Up until they laid off 20-40% of their employees. They were incapable of having real conversations about the challenges and they would not take any responsibility for how the challenges came about, instead blaming the problems all on AI.

Explore other reviews about Clutch

5.0
25 Feb 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

- Strong ownership culture. People are trusted to lead initiatives and make decisions. If you bring ideas, you’ll get support to test and build them. - Collaborative and empathetic environment. Marketing, Product, Revenue, and Ops work closely together to solve real challenges. - Mission-oriented team. There’s shared belief in helping businesses make confident decisions, and that shows up in the way teams approach their work. * I used ChatGPT to clarify my thoughts, not write them for me.

Cons

- Fast-moving environment. As the market shifts, especially with AI reshaping search and discovery, priorities have been evolving quickly. - High-performance expectations. It can be challenging, but you’re expected to deliver outcomes, not just activity. - Ambiguity at times. With innovation comes experimentation, which means not every initiative has a perfectly defined playbook from day one. * I used ChatGPT to clarify my thoughts, not write them for me.

2.0
4 Mar 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

The product was very strong and the company was performing well at the time. It also offered great perks, a nice office, and an enjoyable work environment.

Cons

The leadership culture appeared to favor loyalty and agreement over open discussion. Senior executives seemed most comfortable surrounded by people who consistently affirmed their views, and challenging ideas—even when intended to improve outcomes—was not always welcomed. In several cases, departures within the Account Management and Sales teams appeared to be influenced less by performance and more by personal alignment or relationships with leadership. Promotions and visibility often seemed tied to what could jokingly be described as a “YES KPI,” where the ability to enthusiastically agree with leadership sometimes felt like the most reliable path to advancement. At moments, the dynamic resembled what some might call a form of kakistocracy, where proximity to power mattered more than constructive debate or merit.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All