Overall good place to have an R&D career - Associate Research Scientist Dow Employee Review

4.0
16 Nov 2014
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Compensation is competitive compared to other chemical companies, benefits are quite good, and work-life balance is very good. Workplace culture is competitive but not cut-throat, and most everyone is helpful and good to work with. Lots of resources are available for R&D work and there are plenty of experts around should you need to leverage expertise in your projects. Good support for IP fillings should you have patentable technologies come out of your research. Safety protocols are first in class.

Cons

Like other big companies, there is a process for everything, and it can be burdensome at times. Safety protocols are excellent at Dow, but at times can make progress quite difficult for lab researchers. Too much emphasis on growing project management and other soft skills, not enough emphasis on growing technical expertise.

Explore other reviews about Dow

5.0
20 June 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Surrounded by great people to work with.

Cons

There are opportunities of pay progression for good performers.

2.0
22 Mar 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Safety culture, flexibility (although less and less over time). Good health insurance and 401k match

Cons

Dow’s recent years illustrate the challenges of trying to simultaneously satisfy Wall Street’s demands for strong financial performance and aggressive DEI (Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion) priorities. The company has heavily emphasized inclusion initiatives, including its openly gay CEO publicly sharing that coming out was one of the best days of his life in an internal communication, along with a notable increase in women appointed to senior leadership roles. Hiring practices reportedly require diverse candidate slates—including female candidates—and diverse interview panels before filling positions. These efforts, while well-intentioned, appear to have contributed to a series of questionable strategic decisions. Employees have borne the brunt through repeated rounds of layoffs (including significant cuts announced in recent years), minimal merit increases often in the 2-3% range, stalled promotions, and little turnover at the top levels of leadership. Senior executives seem insulated from the consequences, potentially overlooking how these factors—including their own leadership—may be central to the company’s ongoing struggles.

2
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All