Overall a good company to work for, but you'll be spread thin. - Senior Administrative Specialist Dow Employee Review

3.0
27 Jan 2023
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Everybody I've interacted with is generally professional and means well. Mid level management is overall pretty good. The company has a pretty good Design your Workday program that allows certain employees to work a hybrid schedule. It is also a great company for parents. The leaders I worked for have been pretty flexible with time off and flex time.

Cons

Over time the company as a whole has been really spreading people thin. You will likely do more work than would be expected of you in a different company. If you participate on teams or volunteer to take on large projects, you will not necessarily get promoted or significant raises based on it - Usually it just ends up being more work piled on top of the already large pile of work that you already have with no significant compensation. Part of the culture seems to be to always strive to do slightly more than your assigned role. Aside from this, the company will make changes to processes with little to no warning and without asking for input or researching how it will logistically work in practice. Generally, these process changes have a negative impact and cause increased bureaucracy, unnecessary work time, confusion and negatively effects the overall culture.

Explore other reviews about Dow

5.0
11 June 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Great team and company culture room for growth and great experience

Cons

Inflexible schedules Poor management sometimes depending on team

2.0
22 Mar 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Safety culture, flexibility (although less and less over time). Good health insurance and 401k match

Cons

Dow’s recent years illustrate the challenges of trying to simultaneously satisfy Wall Street’s demands for strong financial performance and aggressive DEI (Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion) priorities. The company has heavily emphasized inclusion initiatives, including its openly gay CEO publicly sharing that coming out was one of the best days of his life in an internal communication, along with a notable increase in women appointed to senior leadership roles. Hiring practices reportedly require diverse candidate slates—including female candidates—and diverse interview panels before filling positions. These efforts, while well-intentioned, appear to have contributed to a series of questionable strategic decisions. Employees have borne the brunt through repeated rounds of layoffs (including significant cuts announced in recent years), minimal merit increases often in the 2-3% range, stalled promotions, and little turnover at the top levels of leadership. Senior executives seem insulated from the consequences, potentially overlooking how these factors—including their own leadership—may be central to the company’s ongoing struggles.

2
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All