Nothing wrong with GM - Engineer General Motors (GM) Employee Review

4.0
17 June 2008
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

General Motors offered lots of flexibility regarding time off/work life balance. My managers were always agreeable when I needed to take time off, however I did not abuse this benefit like some did. The salary was acceptable, nothing great but not bad either. I could have left to get a higher salary but I preferred the better working conditions over a higher salary. The benefits were fairly good as well.

Cons

Unfortunately, there were limited opportunities for promotion (within the Engineering area) due to downsizing. Whenever a manager would leave or retire, they would basically take the people who worked for him/her and put them under someone else, instead of replacing the manager by promoting someone. In addition, the overall automotive sector, especially the US manufacturers, is not doing well. GM/Ford are having a hard time competing due to high structural costs.

Explore other reviews about General Motors (GM)

5.0
5 June 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

- Very professional environment - Promotions go to the most qualified regardless of race or gender etc - Doing a great job at your role and/or taking on additional work gets noticed - Competitive salaries and benefits

Cons

Work can be demanding at times and, as a profressional, you're expected to get the job done

3.0
6 May 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

GM offers above-average benefits compared with many employers, including solid healthcare, retirement, and time-off options. Compensation is generally competitive and aligned with market value, especially for engineering and technical roles. The hybrid work schedule at the Tech Center is a positive, offering better flexibility than fully onsite roles while still allowing collaboration with teams in person.

Cons

GM’s current performance management culture can be a major morale killer. The stacked ranking approach and forced distribution create an environment where employees may feel they are competing against peers instead of being evaluated purely on performance. There also appears to be a cap on how many employees within a group can receive higher performance ratings. A manager may tell you throughout the year that you are exceeding expectations, but the final review can still come back as “meets expectations” because of calibration, quotas, or internal politics. Like many large corporations, it can be easy to feel like a small cog in a very large machine. Decision-making is often driven heavily by cost reduction, investor expectations, and headcount efficiency, sometimes at the expense of morale and long-term employee engagement. The “Workplace of Choice” messaging can feel disconnected from the actual employee experience, especially when performance ranking, headcount reduction, and workload expectations do not align with that message.

1
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All