Engineer at Spring Hill - Engineer General Motors (GM) Employee Review

1.0
10 Apr 2025
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Health insurance is good. Pay is OK but definitely not the most competitive for similar engineering roles in the area. Offer a lot of training but nothing that can really help you outside of GM

Cons

EXTREMELY Toxic work environment. Micromanaging leadership 0 work life balance. Unreliable/unorganized rotating shift schedule. Find out which off shift you'll be working with about 3-4 days advanced notice. 6-7 day a work weeks. Notified if you're required to work the weekend on Friday. Engineers don't even get a desk, you get a rolling TV media cart. Or build your own from scrap stuff you find laying around. Have to buy your own chair.

avatar
General Motors (GM) Response
1y
Thank you for taking the time to write a review and share your feedback with us. We carefully read each review, value your input, and will share the feedback as appropriate.

Explore other reviews about General Motors (GM)

5.0
13 Apr 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

good benefits and good culture

Cons

as of now, no cons,

3.0
6 May 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

GM offers above-average benefits compared with many employers, including solid healthcare, retirement, and time-off options. Compensation is generally competitive and aligned with market value, especially for engineering and technical roles. The hybrid work schedule at the Tech Center is a positive, offering better flexibility than fully onsite roles while still allowing collaboration with teams in person.

Cons

GM’s current performance management culture can be a major morale killer. The stacked ranking approach and forced distribution create an environment where employees may feel they are competing against peers instead of being evaluated purely on performance. There also appears to be a cap on how many employees within a group can receive higher performance ratings. A manager may tell you throughout the year that you are exceeding expectations, but the final review can still come back as “meets expectations” because of calibration, quotas, or internal politics. Like many large corporations, it can be easy to feel like a small cog in a very large machine. Decision-making is often driven heavily by cost reduction, investor expectations, and headcount efficiency, sometimes at the expense of morale and long-term employee engagement. The “Workplace of Choice” messaging can feel disconnected from the actual employee experience, especially when performance ranking, headcount reduction, and workload expectations do not align with that message.

1
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All