Poor Treatment of Contractors and Lack of Career Progression - Tablet inspector Gilead Sciences Employee Review

1.0
6 June 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

The role can provide valuable GMP and pharmaceutical manufacturing experience, particularly for graduates or those looking to get a foot in the door of the industry. Some colleagues are supportive and hardworking, and the experience can help build skills that are transferable to other roles.

Cons

My experience as a contractor was disappointing. Despite the company's stated values of accountability, integrity, teamwork, inclusion, and equality, I did not feel included or valued as part of the team. There appeared to be a clear divide between permanent employees and contractors, with contractors often treated as disposable resources rather than team members. Management was highly focused on targets and productivity, often to the point of micromanagement. Breaks were closely monitored, targets were regularly increased, and although quality was frequently promoted as the top priority, the reality was that hitting production numbers seemed to matter more than maintaining quality standards. Communication from management was poor, and contractors were often left feeling unsupported and uninformed. There was little respect shown to workers on the line, and concerns raised by employees did not appear to be taken seriously. Contractors were regularly reminded of how replaceable they were, and there were instances where people were told their positions could be terminated if expectations were not met. Job security is also a major concern. Many contractors spend years working on site without any realistic path to permanent employment. Opportunities for progression are extremely limited, and people can remain in temporary positions for extended periods with little recognition or advancement. Another issue is that employees are sometimes hired for one role and then expected to work in different areas while remaining on lower contractor pay rates. For a company with significant financial resources, compensation and treatment of contractors felt disappointing.

Explore other reviews about Gilead Sciences

5.0
18 June 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

good company to work for

Cons

no serious cons to be listed

1.0
18 June 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

-The only pros are the amazing benefits - probably the best 401K I've seen as well as the highly competitive salaries.

Cons

-Lack of culture is a growing and rampant issue - there is a very high level of favoritism -Micromanagement from senior leadership - instances occuered where they essentially forced an employee to resign and not directly fire him/her just so that they wouldn't have to pay severence package, etc. Managers want to just make themselves look good and make it clear that your only job is to acf as if they are God's gift to this messed up planet. -Lack of proper communication and frequent unnecessary team meetings held which are a waste of time and do not accomplish any desirable results.

2
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All