Shady company with shady practices - HR Heirloom (MA) Employee Review

1.0
26 June 2024
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Nothing good but they pay.

Cons

This company abuses its employees and gets away with it because they pay better than most jobs in the area. The owners all have issues. One is even convicted of a sex crime. They use you and fire you without notice. Literally on the spot. They overwork employees. At one point even attempted to hire people as contractors (w9) despite the role requirements made the employees a W2 employee. Just one of the violations I saw first hand. They rather pay fines to the city than be compliant; Always looking for loopholes. This city has regulations for a reason and this company disregard all of them when they can. They do shoddy work in construction. The guests frequently complain about the houses. Everyone can see the complaints on the BBB. The owners have no morals and use unethical means to get investors’ money. (Can’t give details online). They also have prejudicial hiring practices and refused to hire New Orleans natives; especially for director level roles. (Also can’t give details about things said because my review was flagged). The company is very homogeneous by intent. Glassdoor flagged my review when I went into detail. But readers can figure this one out. Think ‘disparate impact.’ Look at the city’s demographics and look at the company’s. Do not work for them! They are disgustingly dishonest people and you will be fired and your job sent to overseas. (If it’s a remote based job)

Explore other reviews about Heirloom (MA)

5.0
18 Apr 2021
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Nice work environments and colleagues

Cons

A bit chaos in communications

1
2.0
31 May 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

The immediate team was solid and the office location was fine.

Cons

. Frequent restructuring announcements created repeated disruption without delivering meaningful improvements. . Responsibilities and reporting lines constantly changed, leading to ongoing confusion about who was accountable for what. . Departments and teams were repeatedly reshuffled, making it difficult to maintain any stable workflow. .Employees were forced to continually relearn processes that were often replaced before they could be fully established. . Underlying operational problems were never addressed, with changes focused on structure rather than real fixes. . Constant reorganizations undermined morale and made progress feel temporary and unstable. . The ongoing cycle of change led to disengagement as employees lost confidence in any lasting improvement.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All