The lights are on but nobodys in! - Penetration Tester IT Governance Employee Review

1.0
23 June 2016
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

The pay is quite good, however, they don't pay overtime and have very illogical processes that make easy matters complicated and therefore is not as favorable as initially suggested.

Cons

Unable to calculate bonusses correctly and or on time. Working out what you had been paid for was always guess work and clarification was hard to come by. Upon termination of contract refused to pay bonuses that were previously shown on pay slip. Got sacked for refusing to work on Christmas Eve. Used outdated technology and had a problem with us using our own 4k monitors etc. Seemed to have an issue with highlighting process violations the offending members of staff and CEO. Really poor chairs, did little to remedy. Bad lighting. Would not purchase equipment required for extensive testing. If you have any suggestions make sure you make them to your line manager as otherwise they may seem threatened. Do not highlight your teamleaders elementary mistakes in security training material that the company sends out as to its customers as again this may make your boss look like an idiot and could threaten your position.

Explore other reviews about IT Governance

3.0
9 Apr 2025
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Learned a lot. The job was interesting.

Cons

Disconnect between the US and UK. Senior management understood the business of cybersecurity. But they did not understand business management.

1.0
6 Feb 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

While the role was fully remote, this was undermined by negative communication through internal messaging tools. Overall, I would not recommend IT Governance / GRC Solutions to anyone seeking a supportive, well-structured workplace or long-term career development.

Cons

Working at IT Governance / GRC Solutions was a frustrating experience overall. While the company presents itself externally as a professional cyber security organisation, the internal reality did not reflect this. I worked in Marketing, and from summer 2025 there was a lack of clear direction from the CMO. Expectations and priorities changed frequently, making it difficult to do the role effectively or feel confident in performance. Feedback often felt reactive rather than constructive, and there was a persistent sense of blame rather than support, which created ongoing anxiety about job security. Communication from senior leadership lacked transparency. Decisions were often attributed to external ownership without meaningful explanation, leaving teams unclear on strategy or long-term goals. Workloads were consistently unrealistic, with tight deadlines and minimal support. Burnout appeared common, yet concerns raised by staff were rarely addressed in a meaningful way. There were no clear career development opportunities, and progression felt limited unless you were already favoured by management. The culture within Marketing felt particularly difficult. Management style relied heavily on criticism and pressure, which contributed to a toxic environment, low morale, and unnecessary stress. Positive recognition was rare, while criticism was frequent and often poorly delivered.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All