If you want to be treated like a piece of meat - Anonymous employee Lifetime Legal Employee Review

1.0
9 Jan 2017
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Good group of people, usually bought together by a mutual disappointment of management and owner

Cons

CEO regularly changes commission structures when he thinks he is paying out to much money. He has even asked for money back that he had paid out to Staff. Outrageous - tried on multiple occasions to emotionally blackmail staff into doing this. Also at one point tried to get the whole company to sacrifice salary in place of shares and did this by implying one day the company would be worth 10 million plus and return on investment would be huge. Ironic as since I've been here the company has not once made a profit.

Explore other reviews about Lifetime Legal

1.0
2 July 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

It was a job and some of the people in my team were lovely that weren’t management

Cons

Hire and fire company Claim to have parking but it’s full so you have to park on the road No compassion or support Management all related

1.0
16 Feb 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

The service provided to estate agents is strong in theory and has real potential when executed well. There are also genuinely good people working within the business at peer level who are supportive and hardworking.

Cons

The most significant issue is leadership culture. Advancement, recognition, bonuses and opportunities do not seem to follow transparent or merit-based criteria. There is a noticeable pattern of preferential treatment toward individuals with personal relationships to senior leadership, which undermines morale and trust across teams. Leadership style can feel hierarchical and, at times, authoritarian. Dissenting views or constructive challenge are often not welcomed, and employees feel that career progression depends more on alignment and silence rather than performance or integrity. Communication from certain members of management is inconsistent. Requests for clarity or support are sometimes ignored, and when responses are provided, they lack transparency or accountability. This creates an environment where teams feel unsupported. There also appears to be limited psychological safety when raising concerns. Escalating issues — including through HR — can feel risky, and employees worry about the consequences of speaking openly. Whether intentional or not, this perception significantly impacts trust within the organisation. Operational planning is reactive rather than proactive. The first half of the year is typically high-pressure due to staffing and planning shortfalls, followed by workforce reductions once the busy period passes. Teams are frequently left understaffed with limited contingency planning, increasing stress and burnout.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All