Very Poor Senior Leadership, Very Flat Organization - Anonymous employee Mastercard Employee Review

2.0
5 Dec 2018
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

High pay. Offers stock awards.

Cons

Senior leaders protect themselves and are not respectful of staff. A lot of new senior leaders being recruited from non-financial industries (e.g. CPG, Health, Pharma, etc) have no clue of the payments industry business and really have nothing to contribute other than talk about what they used to do in their old world. Some senior leaders very unprofessional in demeanor in dealing with staff, peers, other BU staff during meetings and everyday collaborations. Obvious favoritism at an all-time high in the organization. HR useless — pro management and cannot be trusted to support employees.

Explore other reviews about Mastercard

5.0
11 June 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Technically strong and work culture is good

Cons

interview process is long , no issues

4.0
27 May 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Mastercard does a great job fostering an inclusive and supportive environment. There are genuinely good people throughout the organization, and leadership often invests in employee engagement through events, recognition, and culture-building initiatives. I enjoyed many of the relationships I built while working there, and there are teams that truly care about collaboration and supporting one another.

Cons

Compensation at the director level did not feel competitive compared to the level of responsibility expected. Career advancement can also be extremely challenging due to how top-heavy the organization is with senior leadership roles. There are a large number of Senior Vice Presidents, sometimes without clear scope or experience aligned to the title, which creates limited room for high-performing employees to grow. At times, it felt like senior leaders were being hired primarily to manage or communicate with other senior leaders, rather than drive meaningful operational impact. In product and go-to-market roles especially, priorities are often heavily driven by funding decisions. It can be frustrating when projects suddenly shift in importance or remain underfunded for long periods of time while awaiting senior leadership review. This sometimes leaves highly talented employees in limbo, unable to move initiatives forward despite strong momentum or market opportunity. The organization can also be very comfortable with the status quo, which creates a slower pace that many employees seem accustomed to. For people who are highly motivated and eager to drive change, it can feel difficult to navigate the number of roadblocks and layers of approval required to move initiatives forward.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All