Toxic place. Does not follow what they preach - Human Resources Mastercard Employee Review

1.0
30 June 2020
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Salary, bonus structure is great.

Cons

My last day at this company will be one of the happiest days of my life. 1. They really overwork you and see you struggle but will rather lose great employees than have to increase headcount. 2. People of color constantly leave and it’s because there is no sense of belonging nor promoting from within. Just look at their executive leadership. You can google this. There is no people of color and yet diversity is “key” for them. 3. HR does not care for the well-being and health stability of their employees. This might be different in other departments but not in HR. Several people have departed the department in the last couple of years. 4. Only way you are promoted is about who you know

Explore other reviews about Mastercard

5.0
24 May 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Great culture. Stable. Analytical and rewarding if you find the right product.

Cons

Slower career growth. Not as influential

4.0
27 May 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Mastercard does a great job fostering an inclusive and supportive environment. There are genuinely good people throughout the organization, and leadership often invests in employee engagement through events, recognition, and culture-building initiatives. I enjoyed many of the relationships I built while working there, and there are teams that truly care about collaboration and supporting one another.

Cons

Compensation at the director level did not feel competitive compared to the level of responsibility expected. Career advancement can also be extremely challenging due to how top-heavy the organization is with senior leadership roles. There are a large number of Senior Vice Presidents, sometimes without clear scope or experience aligned to the title, which creates limited room for high-performing employees to grow. At times, it felt like senior leaders were being hired primarily to manage or communicate with other senior leaders, rather than drive meaningful operational impact. In product and go-to-market roles especially, priorities are often heavily driven by funding decisions. It can be frustrating when projects suddenly shift in importance or remain underfunded for long periods of time while awaiting senior leadership review. This sometimes leaves highly talented employees in limbo, unable to move initiatives forward despite strong momentum or market opportunity. The organization can also be very comfortable with the status quo, which creates a slower pace that many employees seem accustomed to. For people who are highly motivated and eager to drive change, it can feel difficult to navigate the number of roadblocks and layers of approval required to move initiatives forward.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All