Times are changing ......... - Director Mastercard Employee Review

1.0
10 Aug 2015
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Great work culture within line staff. Energetic, youngish, educated and creative. New office with great facilities. Best Xmas parties! Pay senior staff very well due to long term employees. Now owned by Mastercard, big brand name with very professional systems in place

Cons

Previous owner was dynamic, strong leader, however her business practices were highly immoral aka illegal and purely based on profit - totally against company ethos. Mastercard now learning that they may have acquired a ''lemon'', hence major cuts will need to be made. We all wonder how their auditors missed the dodgy books!? Senior level staff just hanging in for the ride and they are highly paid with not much to do. If MC want them gone, they will have to pay them out. Hence, moral very low as future if unknown.

Explore other reviews about Mastercard

5.0
23 June 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

People are highly intelligent and things seem to operate efficiently

Cons

Large ship so changes are hard to make

4.0
27 May 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Mastercard does a great job fostering an inclusive and supportive environment. There are genuinely good people throughout the organization, and leadership often invests in employee engagement through events, recognition, and culture-building initiatives. I enjoyed many of the relationships I built while working there, and there are teams that truly care about collaboration and supporting one another.

Cons

Compensation at the director level did not feel competitive compared to the level of responsibility expected. Career advancement can also be extremely challenging due to how top-heavy the organization is with senior leadership roles. There are a large number of Senior Vice Presidents, sometimes without clear scope or experience aligned to the title, which creates limited room for high-performing employees to grow. At times, it felt like senior leaders were being hired primarily to manage or communicate with other senior leaders, rather than drive meaningful operational impact. In product and go-to-market roles especially, priorities are often heavily driven by funding decisions. It can be frustrating when projects suddenly shift in importance or remain underfunded for long periods of time while awaiting senior leadership review. This sometimes leaves highly talented employees in limbo, unable to move initiatives forward despite strong momentum or market opportunity. The organization can also be very comfortable with the status quo, which creates a slower pace that many employees seem accustomed to. For people who are highly motivated and eager to drive change, it can feel difficult to navigate the number of roadblocks and layers of approval required to move initiatives forward.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All