Lack of progression, off shoring to Pine, quiet firing - Director, Software Engineering Mastercard Employee Review

1.0
11 Mar 2025
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Some of the people are super skilled and very capable.

Cons

Too many Directors, real lack of progression. Partial performance reviews without clarity on next steps. Lots of male leadership. Insufficient women representation in senior roles. Recent hiring in Pune has displaced jobs but it has not been dealt with transparency and professionalism. Quiet firing on the rise by sudden changes of responsibilities and teams being reorganised without consulting Directors who are Senior managers within the organisation and teams who'd be impacted. Mastercard Way talks about great values but several of the senior leaders don't live it. It's like someone has a checkbox to make cost savings, the person is then sidelined until they leave or released with minimal notice, details or paid for the inconvenience. Not a company to invest time and effort in.

Explore other reviews about Mastercard

5.0
23 June 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

People are highly intelligent and things seem to operate efficiently

Cons

Large ship so changes are hard to make

4.0
27 May 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Mastercard does a great job fostering an inclusive and supportive environment. There are genuinely good people throughout the organization, and leadership often invests in employee engagement through events, recognition, and culture-building initiatives. I enjoyed many of the relationships I built while working there, and there are teams that truly care about collaboration and supporting one another.

Cons

Compensation at the director level did not feel competitive compared to the level of responsibility expected. Career advancement can also be extremely challenging due to how top-heavy the organization is with senior leadership roles. There are a large number of Senior Vice Presidents, sometimes without clear scope or experience aligned to the title, which creates limited room for high-performing employees to grow. At times, it felt like senior leaders were being hired primarily to manage or communicate with other senior leaders, rather than drive meaningful operational impact. In product and go-to-market roles especially, priorities are often heavily driven by funding decisions. It can be frustrating when projects suddenly shift in importance or remain underfunded for long periods of time while awaiting senior leadership review. This sometimes leaves highly talented employees in limbo, unable to move initiatives forward despite strong momentum or market opportunity. The organization can also be very comfortable with the status quo, which creates a slower pace that many employees seem accustomed to. For people who are highly motivated and eager to drive change, it can feel difficult to navigate the number of roadblocks and layers of approval required to move initiatives forward.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All