The company relies heavily on EOS-style quarterly planning and management style (read up on it before applying), with leadership defining in detail what teams will deliver rather than empowering product and engineering teams to determine the best way to Get s**t done (which is funnily enough meant to be a value) This creates a very top-down environment and limits autonomy, ownership, and modern product and engineering practices.
There appears to be consistently high turnover across product and engineering, including engineers and managers, which creates instability and makes it difficult to build long-term momentum.
Ways of working feel more old fashioned than discovery-led or empowered.
There is also an expectation of high availability, contributing to weaker work/life balance than advertised.
Also look at the influx of 5 star reviews all at the same time, suspicious?