employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

Native Plant Trust

Is this your company?

Talented Staff, but weak CEO who is partial to favoritism and political compliance - Anonymous employee Native Plant Trust Employee Review

1.0
7 Mar 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

The staff are thoughtful, committed, and genuinely care about the mission. Many colleagues are collaborative and hardworking, and there is a strong sense that people want the organization to succeed. When teams work well together, the environment can be supportive.

Cons

Leadership transparency and trust are ongoing issues. Organizational restructuring and leadership decisions are often communicated after the fact, which leaves staff trying to interpret changes without clear context. This leads to speculation, confusion about authority, and uncertainty about long term direction. There are also concerns among staff about favoritism and political alignment within leadership. When some individuals receive protection or advancement despite performance concerns, it weakens morale and confidence in internal processes. The organization does not have a dedicated HR department, which makes workplace conflicts difficult to resolve.

Explore other reviews about Native Plant Trust

5.0
7 June 2023
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Being in the woods amongst plants and plant people cannot be beat.

Cons

Typical small non-profit woes, but this is par for the course!

1.0
17 May 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Invaluable mission, important conservation work, and a gem of a botanical garden.

Cons

It is hard to properly convey how disastrous the Board's decision to hire this CEO has been. These last few years have felt more like an executive internship than anything resembling qualified leadership. While the organization may have weathered that alone, with it has come a complete absence of ethics or basic judgment. Culture has collapsed into toxicity and dysfunction. An already under-resourced nonprofit now finds itself paying for a steady stream of consultants and investigations — all to resolve mismanaged situations with the CEO's fingerprints on them. Staff has learned that speaking truth to power comes at a personal cost. Institutional knowledge has been chased out the door. What little HR exists has been weaponized to justify restructuring decisions that were made long before any process began. Targeting of select employees has been encouraged. Retaliation against those who speak up has occurred. There were problems before. They were nothing like this. And despite being made fully aware of these issues, Board response has been performative and insufficient.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All