employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

Nordic Consulting Partners

Engaged employer

Evolution at the Cost of Morale, Work/Life Balance, and Culture - Senior Applications Advisor/Applications Lead Nordic Consulting Partners Employee Review

3.0
19 Mar 2021
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Nordic’s ability to attract top talent has always been the company’s biggest strength. For the most part, working at Nordic means working with driven, caring, and intelligent people. I've made life long friendships at Nordic, and I've also enjoyed enormous personal and professional growth thanks to many of the wonderful people I've worked with and under over the years. However, things are changing.

Cons

I worked in Nordic’s Managed Services division for several years. As I mentioned earlier, Nordic is changing. A business’ ability to evolve over time is a vital component of maintaining healthy growth, but the last 12-24 months has seen an increased emphasis on fueling growth at the expense of morale, work/life balance, and culture. The addition of a former EY Partner as CEO and half a dozen or more former EY executives in key leadership positions has exacerbated the shift towards a more corporate culture, and the inherent dysfunction in divisions like Managed Services has only grown worse as a consequence of the pandemic and recent hiring decisions. In theory, the Managed Services division is geared towards long-term ownership of support and maintenance work at various client healthcare systems. A few clients go further and some teams work on projects and implementations, but the majority of the division is expected to work on tickets and other maintenance. While MS offers a unique growth opportunity for recent college graduates and career switchers through the Associate program, the bulk of the division is made up of former FTEs, consultants, and Epic IS/TS. As such, a fundamental flaw exists which fuels the dysfunction I mentioned earlier: the division can’t adequately staff contracts with the talent they need while maintaining a healthy profit margin. The inability to adequately staff contracts combined with market price pressure means analyst teams are expected to work multiple clients to increase margin. While working multiple clients is a fair expectation, the inability to properly staff contracts leads to a single analyst being split between two, three, or even four clients. It's not uncommon to see dubious assignments like 15% of your time to X client despite the fact the client demands half your week. The math simply doesn’t add up, and a lot of people, Senior Application Advisors and Application Leads in particular, end up working 50-55+ hour weeks to make up for the shortfall. Because of the staffing model, stress and anxiety are rampant. I know people who not only struggle with mental fatigue and burnout, but deal with stress-related physical symptoms too. Sadly, concerns and requests for additional assistance are often met with inaction or, if you’re lucky enough to have a Team Lead with escalation skills or a capacity for empathy, concerns are escalated to senior leadership only to be met with pushback, false promises, or apathy. I know several people even escalated concerns to HR but more than one Team Lead has told me requests to bring on more staff are being blocked by the C-Suite level. As well as fundamental issues in the staffing model, the compounding effect of the pandemic forced an increase in work typically outside the norm: overnight on call rotations for applications outside your own (holidays and weekends included), traditional consulting services contracts being staffed by MS resources, and additional weekend work to support go lives and other projects. I’ve seen Ambulatory teams working Inpatient on call rotations on Christmas and New Years, junior and mid-level analysts making 50k staffing surgery center implementations billed at hourly CS rates, and people being told, not asked, to work weekends to support clients not even engaged in formal contracts. The dysfunction and work imbalance I'm describing is bad enough by itself, but the stress is compounded by the way many of the Team Leads and Senior Team Leads behave and manage their teams. Nordic prefers to promote from within and a large number of TLs and STLs are former SAAs. However, the Delivery leadership group seem to prefer those who show a predilection for making decisions in the company's best interest. The division wants managers who can get their people to say yes more than they want empathetic leaders who will foster growth and wellbeing in their teams, so you often see those who are skilled at suppressing empathy and guilt becoming TLs before others. Given the preference for business-first people above all else, the quality of the Team Lead and Senior Team Lead group is wildly inconsistent. I've worked with some of the most talented and naturally gifted leaders I've ever met, but I've also worked with sycophants who don't care about their team and will agree to anything if it keeps them in leadership's good graces. I've seen TLs go weeks without 1:1s, TLs with only 6 people forget which clients their team members are on, and TLs with no client work sitting at their desks reading sports blogs while their team melts down around them. The inconsistency is destructive, and morale is in the toilet because there doesn't seem to be an effective system for monitoring TL performance and management skill. Feedback is given as part of the annual performance reviews, but bad leaders manage to stick around despite multiple years of poor feedback. As a result of the issues I've described and many others I can't mention because I would end up writing a book, Managed Services is losing top talent at an alarming rate. In the first few months of 2021 alone, at least 20 or more SAAs/AL/TLs have given notice and more are on their way out. To no one's surprise, those leaving are some of the best and brightest in the division. Leadership seems bewildered and don't know how to respond to the brain drain, and remaining staff are being asked to hang tough while they scramble to fill the gaps. Sadly, the division can't replace the talent they're losing because they can't afford it, and it's only a matter of time before client work suffers and escalations start piling up as a result.

avatar
Nordic Consulting Partners Response
5y
Hello, I'm sorry to hear that your impressions of MS and Nordic fell so drastically towards the end of your time here. This is John Manzuk if you'd like to have a conversation. You can probably find my email address, or connect with me on LinkedIn. Managed Services, and Nordic, have always been evolving and changing. I've been here over nine years - it's pretty different today than 2012, and (I think) in a lot of great ways. I'm sorry that the changes you saw seemed to be the wrong ones. 2020 was a challenging year. And you are right, we tried some new things with our Managed Services team to weather as best we could. We asked team members to get cross-trained to help support new applications, and to see if we could get some relief to application teams that had more stressful on-call rotations. We looked for work across Nordic that we could take on. As you know, Managed Services ended up being overstaffed because of some customer decreases, so we looked around for where we could put the extra time we found ourselves with. I apologize if you felt out of the loop for what we were doing, or why. We upped our communication, adding in a weekly video from leadership to our usual schedule of monthly all MS meetings. I'm proud of the job we did reacting to the challenges of 2020, and communicating with our team, but of course there were lessons learned as well. You raised concerns about long weeks you may have had, or that your teammates had or are still having. We watch time-logging closely. We want to see who is ready to take on the next challenge, and (as importantly, if not more) who is underwater and needs help. If there are weeks like the ones you are mentioning, then something is broken. Either that time isn't getting logged, or our reporting is failing to pick it up (which I'm digging into). I'm guessing you are still connected with those teammates, so please ask them to contact me directly if they are facing weeks like you describe. It feels like the biggest disappointment, or loss of trust, you felt was that of management and leadership. I'm going to give that some serious thought. You raised a specific concern that promotions go to employees who will just say "can do" at the expense of their teams. That surprises me. We have portions of our interview process focused on making sure we are promoting independent thinkers who will advocate for their teams fairly. Our Team Lead assessment includes evaluation of how well our Team Leads embody Servant Leadership, how well they communicate and advocate for their teams, and how well they remove obstacles for the teams they support. I appreciate you highlighting how amazing our team is. We just have great people. You are right that we've said goodbye to some amazing team members recently. We've also welcomed back some friends. It says a lot about how great the team is that people who were laid off (obviously really difficult decisions for us) were eager to rejoin the team when we started hiring again.

Explore other reviews about Nordic Consulting Partners

5.0
26 June 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

I’m about a month in, so still relatively new, but my experience so far has been very positive. The team is incredibly welcoming and I felt valued right away. There is a strong remote culture, which I really appreciate, and a great emphasis on work-life balance. My manager is supportive, approachable, and trusts me to do my job without micromanaging. Compensation and benefits are competitive as well. I’m also encouraged by the direction of the company and the energy coming from new leadership.

Cons

There are a lot of moving parts and projects that require fast turnaround times, which can feel a bit hectic at times. That said, it’s understandable given the transitions currently happening across the organization. As a remote company, there is also some opportunity for increased collaboration and alignment across and within teams to ensure clear prioritization, but that feels like a common challenge in a distributed environment.

2.0
6 June 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Nordic has a strong brand in the healthcare IT consulting space, and their delivery reputation is well established. The initial interest in my candidacy felt genuine and the opportunity seemed compelling.

Cons

The recruiting process was lengthy, disorganized, and ultimately revealed significant structural problems in how Nordic approaches executive hiring. The process involved far too many stakeholders and opinions — a clear sign that the hiring manager lacked the confidence and authority to make a decision independently. When a hiring process requires input from an excessive number of people it typically signals one of two things — either the organization doesn't trust its own managers to make decisions, or the hiring manager simply isn't qualified to evaluate candidates at the level they're hiring for. In this case it appeared to be both. After investing significant time across multiple rounds of interviews there was minimal professional follow through, no constructive feedback, and no acknowledgment of the candidate's time and effort. For a company that sells itself on client relationships and professional excellence the candidate experience is a direct contradiction of those stated values.

avatar
Nordic Consulting Partners Response
5d
Thank you for taking the time to share your perspective. We’re sorry to hear that the recruiting process did not meet expectations. Your feedback around the candidate experience has been shared with our recruiting and leadership teams as we continue to improve how we engage with candidates. We appreciate the time you invested and wish you all the best in your next opportunity.
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All