Pros
Weekly pay structure Beyond that, it is difficult to identify any meaningful positives, even when viewed from a strictly objective and non-emotional standpoint
Cons
Existing reviews proved to be accurate; issues became clear within weeks Significant gap between how the role is presented and how it functions in practice Role described as AR ownership but operates as a controlled, task-driven position Heavy micromanagement limits autonomy and professional judgment Core systems (AIA, billing, contracts, QuickBooks) are inconsistent and not maintained to a reliable standard Internal processes do not align, creating inefficiencies and preventing consistent execution Expectations are set at a level that is not realistically achievable given the condition of the underlying systems Tasks are assigned without sufficient context or continuity Prior experience and professional input are not effectively utilized Compensation tied to performance, but the structure does not support achieving those expectations