You Deserve Better... - Content Manager Radancy Employee Review

1.0
11 Oct 2017
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

When I first started at TMP the pros were: Flexible work from home policy, PTO (21 days), every other Friday off in the summer, team happy hours and outings, casual office, awesome city views. Since the company restructured their teams they took away the work remote option (though they still list it on current job listings as a perk.), and Summer Fridays are every other week you get out of work at 2pm. There are some truly great people at TMP- all lower level employees who deserve better…

Cons

This review is speaking only about the content team, I heard things about other teams, but I was not on them therefore I cannot speak to their problems. First, this team is full of talented and creative people who are so overloaded with work that none of their creative ideas can be heard, in short they’re under-utilizing the talent that is right in front of them. The turnover is ridiculous because people are tired of feeling overworked and underappreciated/underpaid. The problem is that TMP doesn’t understand how to market or utilize the content team to make their business grow. It is very sad because content is such an important part to a client’s overall strategy. Recent changes in management and team structure have created a system where members of the content team are mercilessly micromanaged and asked for a million things every second by multiple clients at a time (this is where the overworked part comes into play). How are employees supposed to deliver quality work when the deadlines and asks aren’t reasonable? Any pushback is met with attitude and assumed laziness on the part of the overworked employee. In addition to all the client work you are given, you are also expected to help newer employees who are still learning the ropes, which wouldn’t be an issue IF you weren’t so busy already. So new employees come in and aren’t trained and then things are done wrong and you are blamed – if TMP would adopt some sort of training plan to get new employees a solid understanding of their responsibilities that could solve a number of issues. TMPs attempt at a solution with this problem was to hire 4 managers to oversee teams of 1-5 people, except the issue was they had people who already existed on the teams who could have done that for them, so instead of promoting the talent the already have they brought in new people who also needed to be trained. And the new managers were trying so hard to balance everything they have to do with managing people that it didn’t help at all. There is also the issue of management. Upper management is so far removed from everyday life of their lower level employee’s and they have no idea what is going on “in the trenches”. Good luck getting any help from them. I met Michelle Abbey (CEO) one time and I genuinely liked her and felt as though she was listening to our concerns – but then nothing happened and no solutions were implemented. She asked us why the turnover rate on our team was so astronomical (17 people left within the time I worked there) and we told her the truth, but at this point I wonder if it’s beyond saving. I know this seems like a rant, but I only say this with the hopes that someone who “matters” will see this and maybe something can change for the content team.

Explore other reviews about Radancy

5.0
1 May 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Great place to grow, flexible with family matters and a good work life balance. Learned a lot. Flexible time off is a good perk.

Cons

The rebrand removed a lot of personality from the company which made it hard to service legacy clients.

1
2.0
17 May 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

The people and direct coworkers were genuinely supportive and collaborative. Many employees were dealing with similar challenges, which created a strong sense of teamwork and willingness to help each other. Despite broader organizational issues, most teams worked hard and tried to support one another however they could.

Cons

Leadership doesn’t seem to have a clear direction for the company, so priorities and decisions were constantly changing. A lot of decisions would get made and then completely reversed a few months later, which made it hard to feel confident in anything long term. There were also a lot of staffing and restructuring changes without proper training or support, so people were basically expected to figure things out as they went. The company became very focused on enforcing in-office policies and making sure people were physically at their desks, while employees hadn’t received raises in years despite heavier workloads and inflation. That disconnect was really discouraging and definitely contributed to burnout. Burnout was something constantly talked about across teams, but it rarely felt like anything meaningful was done to actually support employees or improve workloads. A lot of employees were also expected to sell or support products they didn’t fully believe in, which made it hard to feel set up for success from the beginning.

2
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All