Pros
Almost none. Medical benefit not that great, leave not that many.
Cons
My time at this institution was very challenging due to issues with management practices. There was a lack of fairness and transparency in decision-making, where personal preferences often influenced outcomes more than merit or performance. Workload distribution was unequal, with some individuals having the privilege of choosing easier tasks, while more difficult responsibilities were pushed onto others.
Compensation also became a point of contention. Instead of appreciating experience or prior achievements, higher pay was often treated as a justification to expect disproportionately more work — even when colleagues were on the same level. This created an unhealthy and demotivating environment, especially since salary differences were largely due to previous companies’ practices and not the employees’ fault.
Another concerning issue was the lack of empathy and support for staff well-being. Flexibility was rarely granted even in situations that required compassion, leaving employees to feel pressured into prioritizing work over health and family. When concerns were raised, they were often dismissed or ignored, as some staff seemed protected by their connections with higher management.
Overall, the culture prioritized hierarchy and favoritism over professionalism, leaving little room for growth or genuine support. I believe with fairer practices, greater transparency, and real accountability, this could have been a much healthier workplace.