Poorly trained and poor pay. - Graduate Consultant SLR Consulting Employee Review

1.0
2 June 2025
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Opened the door. Flexible working.

Cons

Overall, my experience as a graduate at SLR was disappointing. While the first 10–11 months were relatively positive, the support and attitude toward my development shifted noticeably thereafter. I was not given the opportunity to grow or take on more responsibility, and there was a clear lack of guidance around project and process management — raising questions about whether those leading truly understood these areas themselves. It became evident that my manager did not believe in my potential to step up, which proved to be a serious misjudgment. In my current role, I am now successfully managing larger, more complex projects on the client side — something I was never given the chance to do at SLR. In hindsight, SLR was not a supportive environment for graduates. The lack of development opportunities and active limitations placed on my progression made it a poor place to begin a career.

Explore other reviews about SLR Consulting

5.0
19 Mar 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Good values, Competative pay, good benefits

Cons

Demanding work, large organization burocracy

3.0
26 May 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

On the ground floor there are really good people who are supportive of one another and it does feel like family There is opportunity to grow if you are ambitious and willing put yourself out there - employees often switch groups, relocate or get to work on projects in other parts of the globe Very flexible - many employees are fully remote

Cons

Uneven compensation structure between groups and within groups Inconsistent procedures/ collaboration between global regions Business growing too big too fast; poor acquisition onboarding Senior personnel from legacy companies not willing to adapt and change (I.e. sell to new clients/sectors, adopt new processes/procedures that are more scalable, etc) At times dysfunctional - employees and leadership on different waves lengths, poor communication of vision, competing priorities or goals Too much time spent creating add-on software to automate Finance, HR, Project Management rather than improving preexisting technology

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All