Chaotic management - Digital Marketing Sonova Employee Review

1.0
10 Jan 2024
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Good and smart people Good spending budget Space to experiment

Cons

Inexperienced CEO: Christian Tiessen. Bad in communication and doesn’t pay attention to details. My opionion he is overwhelmed with work and his personal life. For the last 3 years, the same ads have been running (same video and display) and the management wonders why the CPA is getting higher each year. Look at the customer comments on Facebook, they’re making fun of us. The direct competitor Audibene has been doing well because they keep up with times, new creatives and approaches, but not because they have a big budget as what the ceo says.

avatar
Sonova Response
2y
Thank you for taking the time to share your feedback on Glassdoor. In order for Sonova to be able to investigate any concerns, we encourage employees to speak up using the internal channels set up specifically for this purpose. Feedback can be submitted anonymously and will be treated confidentially through the Speak Up! platform, we would encourage you to share your feedback there. Thank you.

Explore other reviews about Sonova

5.0
27 Mar 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Well structured organization good benefits.

Cons

not much of a con

2.0
15 May 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

At a global level, the company has a strong mission and a well‑articulated set of values. What I observed, though, is that the translation of those values into day‑to‑day leadership behaviors varied significantly by region. In Switzerland, leadership seemed more aligned with the long‑term vision — communication was clearer, expectations were consistent, and decisions reflected the stated values. In North America, the operational reality didn’t always match the mission on paper. Some of the leadership behaviors, priorities, and communication patterns were more reactive and short‑term, which created a gap between the company’s stated culture and the lived experience.

Cons

In the North American organization, there was a noticeable absence of cohesive leadership. Department leaders often operated in silos and, at times, undermined one another rather than aligning around shared goals. Challenges were frequently attributed to other teams instead of being addressed collaboratively, which made it difficult to build momentum or drive solutions. Information flow was inconsistent as well — critical details were sometimes withheld until escalated publicly, and the lack of transparency created unnecessary friction. As a result, individuals who attempted to step in, create clarity, or demonstrate leadership were not always supported, which ultimately discouraged proactive problem‑solving. The experience highlighted the importance of leadership teams that model collaboration, share information openly, and create an environment where people feel empowered to contribute.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All