High Expectations, Low Support – Proceed with Caution - Customer Success Specialist Sonova Employee Review

3.0
27 June 2025
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

The hours were great, 7-3:30. Very diverse, lots of cool people. Great team members at the peer level; some colleagues were supportive and collaborative.

Cons

Overall, company is going through layoffs right now… In regards to my team—the credit return dept: Biweekly performance bonus was removed, and daily efficiency targets were raised without additional support. // Workload is constantly shifting, with frequent changes and added responsibilities. // Advancement is difficult — I applied internally three times for other roles but was told I “lacked experience” despite being a strong performer. // Raises were minimal and did not reflect effort or performance. // No overtime allowed in our department, though other teams were offered it regularly. // Department was moved from Operations to the Customer Service dept. Initially we felt welcomed, however, that sense of inclusion diminished over time, and it felt like our presence was more of an obligation than a welcome addition. // Team morale suffered due to micromanagement — everything is closely monitored, and mistakes are treated harshly. // The culture can be tense at times, with noticeable interpersonal friction across different groups. // Be prepared to stay quiet and go with the flow — having an opinion or voicing concerns likely won’t be well received.

Explore other reviews about Sonova

5.0
27 Mar 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Well structured organization good benefits.

Cons

not much of a con

2.0
15 May 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

At a global level, the company has a strong mission and a well‑articulated set of values. What I observed, though, is that the translation of those values into day‑to‑day leadership behaviors varied significantly by region. In Switzerland, leadership seemed more aligned with the long‑term vision — communication was clearer, expectations were consistent, and decisions reflected the stated values. In North America, the operational reality didn’t always match the mission on paper. Some of the leadership behaviors, priorities, and communication patterns were more reactive and short‑term, which created a gap between the company’s stated culture and the lived experience.

Cons

In the North American organization, there was a noticeable absence of cohesive leadership. Department leaders often operated in silos and, at times, undermined one another rather than aligning around shared goals. Challenges were frequently attributed to other teams instead of being addressed collaboratively, which made it difficult to build momentum or drive solutions. Information flow was inconsistent as well — critical details were sometimes withheld until escalated publicly, and the lack of transparency created unnecessary friction. As a result, individuals who attempted to step in, create clarity, or demonstrate leadership were not always supported, which ultimately discouraged proactive problem‑solving. The experience highlighted the importance of leadership teams that model collaboration, share information openly, and create an environment where people feel empowered to contribute.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All