Pros
Some very smart, hardworking people are buried in the org doing their best with nothing to work with.
Cons
The company has been around long enough to know better, and yet competitors who entered the space years later have managed to build better products, retain better talent, and articulate a clearer vision. That says everything about leadership here.
Turnover at the top is constant and chaotic. New leaders cycle in with zero context on the space, no preparation, and no curiosity to learn. Direction is nonexistent. Teams are left to interpret shifting priorities while the roadmap drifts with no explanation.
The C-suite exodus is not a rumor — it's a pattern, and it's a red flag that no reorg will fix.
Leadership culture is toxic. Yelling at employees — in meetings, over Slack, in front of peers — is treated as normal. It isn't. It's demoralizing and it's why good people keep leaving.
Minimal benefits. When employees raise concerns, the response from leadership is dismissive and tone-deaf. The message is clear: people are not a priority here. Lack of investment in employee experience that runs through every other decision made here.
If you're comparing Suki to a competitor, go with the competitor.