Sutter Health is Very Unhealthy - Plant Engineer Sutter Health Employee Review

1.0
12 June 2008
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Sutter is a great place to be from. Treat it as a training ground for a "real" career in healthcare. Sutter is the poster child for how NOT to run a hospital, and how NOT to treat staff. The incredible employee turnover rate means there are always openings, at all levels.

Cons

Very low pay scale; treating patients like cattle; concern from management with nothing but the bottom line, no matter how it impacts patients and staff. Sutter keeps pushing the envelope on maintaining the barely legal levels of staffing and training. When patient care suffers as a result of policy, the front line staff is thrown to the wolves. Prime example: Sutter tried to replace Certified Nursing Assistants with uncertified Patient Care Assistants. The PCA's were former janitorial staff who had all been fired and made to reapply for the new positions... at reduced salary. This was so bad that it only lasted about a year, but the damage was immense and long-lasting.

Explore other reviews about Sutter Health

5.0
11 June 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

The top-notch professionalism work-culture is what made me decide to switch from a contract-worker to a full-time RN.

Cons

I wish that the N95 mask requirement was included while I was in Chicago in my remote physical and urine drug testing during pre-employment. I had to fly in SF for one day to meet the N95 fit requirement then fly back to Chicago to spend more time with family.

3.0
11 June 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Leadership trainings, conferences, educational opportunities, Senior leadership seems to respond to employee feedback, Great organizational transparency and clarity around goals and direction, Front-line leadership receiving recognition more often, Fair (not amazing) compensation and benefits overall, Organization seems to be healthy and growing which is encouraging for job security and retention.

Cons

Unsustainable front-line leadership expectations, responsibilities, and tasks without providing support from supervisors or assistant managers specifically in San Francisco campuses, High burnout risk among front-line leaders which is continuing to increase, Growing list of contradicting or conflicting priorities. Patient experience scores have improved greatly in SF but patient quality/safety and employee satisfaction has become the apparent cost of that, Very unreasonable span of control for front-line leaders, i.e. way too many direct reports, Meeting metrics and KPIs at all costs is the message being received. Front-line leaders are left scrambling to reach the data points (regardless of the methods), to get there. In other words, we might be meeting the metrics and KPIs on paper, but that doesn’t necessarily mean the real purpose or reason behind those metrics is being performed. We’re just desperate to keep our jobs, The leadership culture in the last 6-9 months has shifted towards motivation through fear. Fear of losing our jobs or bonuses rather than motivation by providing actual daily support in doing our jobs and genuine concern and encouragement to succeed.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All