Good Benefits, Bad Managers - Financial Clearance Team Member Sutter Health Employee Review

3.0
5 Feb 2024
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Great benefits. Good pay. My coworkers were great.

Cons

Many managers are purely there because they have years and know people but a lot of them have no idea what they are doing and I've been a part of a few different teams that just got ran into the ground by bad management. There is surprising turnover due to this and they like to hire temps and dangle the full time position in front of them. I was one of few temps who made it through but I've seen many try to get full time positions after being told time and time again they will get it soon just keep reapplying but never get the position. They also let go a bunch of people from California then tried filling the positions outside of California and it didn't work because they tried undercutting the pay massively. They also did a lift up of about 1200 people and during the announcement of this the CEO was smiling and kept talking about how great this was for Sutter and how they will save so much money. Meanwhile people were losing their careers in that meeting and it just didn't seem like the time and place to be bragging about what a great move this was for Sutter.

Explore other reviews about Sutter Health

5.0
11 June 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

The top-notch professionalism work-culture is what made me decide to switch from a contract-worker to a full-time RN.

Cons

I wish that the N95 mask requirement was included while I was in Chicago in my remote physical and urine drug testing during pre-employment. I had to fly in SF for one day to meet the N95 fit requirement then fly back to Chicago to spend more time with family.

3.0
11 June 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Leadership trainings, conferences, educational opportunities, Senior leadership seems to respond to employee feedback, Great organizational transparency and clarity around goals and direction, Front-line leadership receiving recognition more often, Fair (not amazing) compensation and benefits overall, Organization seems to be healthy and growing which is encouraging for job security and retention.

Cons

Unsustainable front-line leadership expectations, responsibilities, and tasks without providing support from supervisors or assistant managers specifically in San Francisco campuses, High burnout risk among front-line leaders which is continuing to increase, Growing list of contradicting or conflicting priorities. Patient experience scores have improved greatly in SF but patient quality/safety and employee satisfaction has become the apparent cost of that, Very unreasonable span of control for front-line leaders, i.e. way too many direct reports, Meeting metrics and KPIs at all costs is the message being received. Front-line leaders are left scrambling to reach the data points (regardless of the methods), to get there. In other words, we might be meeting the metrics and KPIs on paper, but that doesn’t necessarily mean the real purpose or reason behind those metrics is being performed. We’re just desperate to keep our jobs, The leadership culture in the last 6-9 months has shifted towards motivation through fear. Fear of losing our jobs or bonuses rather than motivation by providing actual daily support in doing our jobs and genuine concern and encouragement to succeed.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All