Research Analyst - Research Analyst Third Bridge Employee Review

2.0
2 Aug 2016
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

With the exception of upper management, everyone who worked there was 22-30, so there is certainly a young vibe to the company. The frequent socials are always a good time. If you work there long enough to be promoted to a Research Analyst II, you get to deal with clients directly, which is good exposure. It's also easy to make this role seem more impressive than it actually is on a resume.

Cons

Little work-life balance due to tough monthly quotas. "Research Analyst" is a misnomer, as you're doing very little research of your own; instead, most of your time is spent looking up experts on LinkedIn, tracking down their contact information, and attempting to persuade them over the phone to consult with your client. The company is structured as a series of teams, each with their own leader. Depending on the team you're assigned, it can make or break your experience at the company, as these are the people you'll spend 95% of your day with. As you can imagine, some teams are better than others.

Explore other reviews about Third Bridge

5.0
25 Apr 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Growth, ownership, collaboration, management engagment, client facing opportunities.

Cons

Pace of work and expectations to succeed making a high pressure environment.

2.0
14 Apr 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Good entry-level opportunity with exposure to fast-paced, client-facing work. The company hires driven, sociable individuals and can be a strong starting point for building communication, prioritization, and execution skills in a high-performance environment.

Cons

High turnover and inconsistent management quality significantly impact the employee experience. Success is heavily dependent on your team lead and manager, with limited recourse if you’re placed under ineffective leadership. In my experience, poor communication, lack of emotional intelligence, and unclear expectations from management made it difficult to succeed and negatively affected day-to-day productivity. Internal processes around performance management and PTO lacked transparency. I was placed on a PIP and terminated shortly after (within a week) in a way that felt abrupt and not aligned with prior communication, which was initially framed as a discussion around pending PTO. There were also delays in PTO approvals, and I experienced issues with compensation adjustments following a promotion that required follow-up to resolve.

1
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All