Good people doing repetetive work under inconsistent management - Research Analyst Third Bridge Employee Review

2.0
6 June 2017
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Summary: Acceptable first job, especially if you're interested in a commercial/business career. It will make you work fast and efficiently, at the cost of engagement with the actual research and independence. Superficial and repetitive, work at Third Bridge does not in itself motivate. Instead the company relies on bonuses, the prospect of promotion, and the threat of bad feedback as incentives, largely ignoring the supposed values. Positives: atmosphere, experience, money As mentioned in many reviews, Third Bridge has a nice, international atmosphere, due to the large number of bright, likeminded graduates the firm hires. This is a big factor, as you will work with plenty of people you will enjoy hang out with. There are also some perks like snacks/drinks on Friday and socials. As a first job out of uni, its a good place to gain office experience as well as a crash course in business language and industry knowledge. The fast paced nature of the job pushes people to learn to organise their time very well. There is also an aspect of client relationship management, which is good experience. This is helpful for later job interviews. Bonuses are available for good performance, which means you can make quite good money. Third Bridge also promotes people relatively quickly, which in theory creates the potential for gaining leadership experience early.

Cons

Negatives: leadership, opaque decision making, boring work, micromanagement The word research is misleading, recruitment describes it better. Engagement with content is minimal, there are strong disincentives to actually learning about the topics, because it costs valuable time. Workload is consistently high and together with the target system generates strong incentives to work overtime. This is not compulsory and a minority of people does manage to leave on time consistently. Giving responsibilities to young people can lead to people managing others who have very little experience and not in every case obvious talent for this. Therefore new hires have very different experiences as some managers prioritise short term results over long term development and treat people they like of the same rank widely differently. This is especially true when somebody does not hit their targets, which will be blamed on the individual, regardless of external factors such as the amount of work coming in. The inconsistent treatment applies to other aspects as well, for example leaving the company. Ineffective middle/upper management has in the past failed to address issues of leadership and above average pressure on individuals or teams. The numbers based target system as well as frequent feedback are supposed to ensure transparency and commons standards, but are applied inconsistently. In fact, I often felt as if transparency stops with management: Decisions are taken in closed meeting with most employees being told afterwards or find out when information slowly leaks through the company. In addition to the individual management issues outlined above, there is a general tendency in Third Bridge to micromanage processes in order to maximise narrow, company specific measures of efficiency. Competent employees have been told when and how to communicate dozens of times a day, making them perform worse. Despite a supposed culture of openness and developing people, feedback on the way the firm is run does not seem to be implemented beyond cosmetic measures. You will hear a lot about the values, but I did not feel they were central to the way Third Bridge works.

avatar
Third Bridge Response
8y
Thanks for taking the time to review Third Bridge here on Glassdoor. We really do appreciate all feedback here. We are very sorry to hear about your experience. We take our Code of Conduct and these allegations which you have stated very seriously. We would like to learn more so that we can address your concerns. We have a zero tolerance policy on this, and if you contact us, we will investigate. We do have a firm culture of openness and developing people. You clearly did not feel that our values were central to the way Third Bridge works. Therefore we ask you to get in touch with us and provide as much detailed information and feedback on some of the issues you have lighted and then we can set up a face-to-face meeting to discuss further. Our email is theteam@thirdbridge.com. Again, thanks for the feedback and we wish you all the best for your future. -Team Third Bridge

Explore other reviews about Third Bridge

5.0
25 Apr 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Growth, ownership, collaboration, management engagment, client facing opportunities.

Cons

Pace of work and expectations to succeed making a high pressure environment.

2.0
14 Apr 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Good entry-level opportunity with exposure to fast-paced, client-facing work. The company hires driven, sociable individuals and can be a strong starting point for building communication, prioritization, and execution skills in a high-performance environment.

Cons

High turnover and inconsistent management quality significantly impact the employee experience. Success is heavily dependent on your team lead and manager, with limited recourse if you’re placed under ineffective leadership. In my experience, poor communication, lack of emotional intelligence, and unclear expectations from management made it difficult to succeed and negatively affected day-to-day productivity. Internal processes around performance management and PTO lacked transparency. I was placed on a PIP and terminated shortly after (within a week) in a way that felt abrupt and not aligned with prior communication, which was initially framed as a discussion around pending PTO. There were also delays in PTO approvals, and I experienced issues with compensation adjustments following a promotion that required follow-up to resolve.

1
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All