employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

United Airlines

Is this your company?

Toronto Station-Outsourced by Airport Terminal Services (ATS) - PAX Service Agent United Airlines Employee Review

1.0
27 Nov 2014
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Flexible hours, 40 hours a week

Cons

Not being employed under United Airlines' payroll really is so depressing and doesn't motivate employees to do their jobs with enthusiasm. Most agents don't care whether work is done the right/proper way due to lack of incentives, proper training on each station, and lack of management assistance and awareness in dealing with so many issues. Favoritism is the name of the game. After working 9 months under ATS, even working full time we don't have benefits, promised raise after 6 months was not honored, agents work hard for nothing but the minimum wage. We all feel being taken advantaged of the whole situation.

Explore other reviews about United Airlines

5.0
28 June 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Very inclusive, travel-friendly/encouraging. good work life balance.

Cons

Lower salaries compared to tech industry as a whole.

3.0
22 Apr 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

United is genuinely a good place to work in a lot of ways. The dev side has strong leadership, the work is interesting, and there are real engineers doing real things. When I started, I was proud to tell people where I worked.

Cons

The Quality Engineering org has gone downhill fast since the leadership change about two years ago. It's hard to overstate how much the culture has shifted. The focus now is almost entirely on offshoring roles to India, and the US team has been quietly squeezed—people being nudged toward retirement, others suddenly finding themselves with negative performance feedback after years of solid work. It doesn't feel issue-driven, it feels like a headcount strategy with a polite cover story. On top of that, we spent most of last year implementing process changes that look impressive in a slide deck but don't actually move the needle. Meanwhile, the QE org has drifted away from what the dev leadership is actually trying to build. We're solving problems no one asked us to solve while the real priorities sit on the side. It's frustrating to watch, especially when you know what this team used to be capable of. The day-to-day environment has gotten noticeably toxic. People are checked out, the good ones are looking, and there's a real sense that institutional knowledge is being treated as disposable.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All