employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

Everyday Living

Is this your company?

Everyday Living Reviews

3.3

60% would recommend to a friend

(21 total reviews)

Carol Watson

62% approve of CEO

52% positive business outlook

Everyday Living has an employee rating of 3.3 out of 5 stars, based on 21 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have a good working experience there. The Everyday Living employee rating is in line with the average (within 1 standard deviation) for employers within the Healthcare industry (3.4 stars).

Reviews by job title

21 reviews
2.0
5 Nov 2015

Sexist, Unprofessional

Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

I loved my clients, and it was my first introduction to mental health rehabilitation. I found that I loved it and wanted to make it my career. The 7 on/7 off schedule worked for me quite well.

Cons

Horribly unprofessional, sexist, LOW starting pay, even compared to industry standards. Health insurance prohibitively expensive. Will NOT hire or advance women to house supervisors. Archaic ideas. A true definition of "old boys club." They were not subtle at all to their ideas about women. Hired an incompetent, abusive RN who had several complaints on his license.

3.0
15 June 2017

Right Theory, Rough Execution

Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

- Company does have, in theory, an excellent employee appreciation strategy - Company hires and promotes from within, and there are always opportunities - Independent workdays - Willing to hear and/or let any one from any level suggest and experiment with approaches - The CEO and other leaders in the company are accessible and approachable by employees of any level - in theory and about 80% of the time in practical application

Cons

- Company is growing faster than it's foundation can handle - quantity of services, not quality of services - Scheduling - This is one that could be spoken about at any company, indefinitely. Here are my personal concerns: --Requests for time off, no matter how far in advance are employees' responsibility to cover. This is a problem to me for a couple reasons: 1. It speaks to a lack of understanding of some of the bare bones of scheduling - if good communication, a cogent process and uniform understanding of scheduling by supervisora and team work is present - it should not be a problem for supervisors to work together to create schedules and share employees between houses to accommodate employees who give notice. 2. Employees, especially at sites that only have 1 staff on at a time, do not interact, they do not build any sort of comradeship; they really don't even know each other exsist. As a result, employees do not help each other readily. Its every man for himself, and there's a "get to give" mentality. This shows in scheduling, but also throughout other aspects of the company. 3. Notice of an absence is always best practice - there needs to be *something* in place to encourage and reinforce it. 4. Using Facebook Groups as the primary source of shift coverage is ineffective and frustrating. It is too easy for employees to see how many of their colleagues are looking at their request for help, and not responding. That builds animosity. Facebook is too casual. Employees do not seem to feel as obligated to work a shift they picked up as an after-thought while surfing Facebook. It doesn't seem official - so they show up or not, depending on how they feel that day - if they even remember they picked it up. - Disputes are not addressed in a timely, assertive or resolution-based fashion. If an employee is struggling with another employee, my personal belief is a supervisor immediately needs to encourage being assertive and self-assessing and if needed, conduct a moderated, resolution-based conversation between the two employees. A supervisor should never allow gossiping, feuding, complaining, etc. to go on without making it a priority to identify and attempt to recitify the situation. Employee dissatisfaction in all its incarnations is an insidious barrier to quality service provision.

3.0
12 July 2017

Site supervisor

Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Rewarding job giving back to those with mental health issues Made friends with supportive co workers Chances to move up Somewhat flexible with scheduling Overtime if you wanted it

Cons

At times very "frat" like dynamic with upper management and HR High turn over Not enough trainings HR would throw site supervisors under the bus when they needed support during an issue that was both an HR/site supervisors mistake

Viewing 1 - 3 of 21 Reviews

Glassdoor has 21 Everyday Living reviews submitted anonymously by Everyday Living employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if Everyday Living is right for you.