IMAPAC Reviews

2.5

26% would recommend to a friend

(42 total reviews)

Ting Ting Wang

19% approve of CEO

24% positive business outlook

IMAPAC has an employee rating of 2.5 out of 5 stars, based on 42 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have an average working experience there. The IMAPAC employee rating is 33% below average for employers within the Management and consulting industry (3.7 stars).

Reviews by job title

42 reviews
5.0
8 Jan 2026

Good company with good training

Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

IMAPAC is overall a very good company with areas for improvement. The top management has moved its focus to European expansion in the last 2 years and the new Asia managers are still learning the ropes but trying their best. All the managers are quite kind and genuine people. The sales training are very good in my opinion. There is weekly sales training, thoughtful Monday every week, also monthly mindset trainings by the CEO to uplift employees. To be honest it is quite rare for CEO to spend time do that, compared with previous jobs I've worked for where top management only pushes for results. Commission scheme is quite generous and no cap so it's really up to you how much you want to make.

Cons

Unfortunately there was a previous employee that spread harmful untrue rumours about the management and some employees which has created lots of upsets, conflicts and misunderstandings that led to a number of people leave last year. This person has left the company now but the damage is done. I feel the management should have caught it and handled it earlier rather than letting it get out of hand. From my observation, there are quite some discrepancy is skillsets between the experienced sales vs. junior sales, some top sales manager can achieve 3x to 5x over target, but some juniors can barely achieve 1/3. So it is really a matter of your competency to determines your stress level. The products are good and the best in Asia which helps. The management is kind but tough, if you don't perform, you will be put on notice with re-trainings and strict target sets, either you perform or you are let go. So for those who wants an easy time loafing around, look elsewhere. But for those who is competent and wants a challenge, you can make a lot of money here.

1.0
9 June 2025
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

The production team is honestly the best part of this company. We look out for each other and work as a true team.

Cons

The company has little to no respect for the production function, despite the fact that every single conference begins with us. If sales underperform, production gets blamed—even if we’ve delivered a strong agenda with high-quality speakers. But if sales do well, the credit (and commission) goes entirely to the sales team. Producers get no bonuses, no recognition—zero. We are constantly expected to do everyone’s job. From doing sales’ research (even though everything’s already in the business plan, which no one reads), to providing long lists of target companies for them to pitch. Networking team asks us to do their research too. On top of that, we’re expected to secure 5 speakers per week, create ebooks (which take at least a week of research), and juggle multiple conferences at once. We’re even expected to build awards programs from scratch, and even host it.. This would be unrealistic even if we were only doing our own job. But the amount of work dumped on production is insane, and no matter what, if something goes wrong, production is the first to be blamed. No sales? Production's fault. No delegates? Production's fault. AC not working? Production's fault. Post-event meetings often feel like waiting to be thrown under the bus, regardless of how well the event actually went. And if things do go well, sales and networking get all the praise while production is ignored. There’s also an ongoing issue of cost-cutting that directly affects conference quality. Speakers, sponsors, and VIPs often give negative feedback about poor event quality, and even though we’ve raised these concerns repeatedly, management’s solution is always to cut costs further—not improve the experience. Travel? We fly on low-cost airlines, sometimes have ridiculously long layovers, and those layovers aren’t even paid. No lounge access, no support—we’re just left to "figure it out." And somehow, we’re still expected to arrive fresh and ready to deliver a flawless conference. This isn’t a holiday—we're representing the company, yet they treat us like an afterthought. We even have to share rooms with colleagues, which means waking up early to get ready, no privacy, and no real rest. And then there are the monthly trainings. They add zero value. Every single time, it’s two hours of fluff (even though the CEO says it’ll only be one hour), and sometimes we even get homework. For what? It’s absurd. It’s just another way to waste our already-limited time. The worst part is, people are resigning left and right—and instead of investigating why, management just keeps holding more pointless trainings. They don’t hire replacements. They don’t fix the actual problems. They just push even more work onto the people who remain. And when it’s convenient, they’ll fire staff without warning. And finally, the compensation is nowhere near adequate for the amount of work and stress this role demands. We do the work of several departments, yet get paid peanuts.

1.0
5 June 2025
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

There are smart, passionate individuals within the team who genuinely care about their work and try to make a difference despite the challenges

Cons

The founder actively promotes and imposes Scientology based principles within company operations often in ways that have no relevance to a normal business environment. Instead of addressing structural issues, the blame is shifted onto employees’ “mindsets,” as though personal attitude alone can fix systemic problems. We are regularly told we need to “change our mindset” and even “save the world,” despite being paid wages that can barely sustain basic living. The disconnect between grandiose expectations and actual support is staggering. Management’s mindset training are often vague and high-level, yet employees are expected to spend an excessive amount of time gathering and formatting detailed data just to fully understand the assignment after the training. The process is inefficient, draining, and demoralising.

Viewing 1 - 3 of 42 Reviews

Glassdoor has 49 IMAPAC reviews submitted anonymously by IMAPAC employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if IMAPAC is right for you.