Mathematica Reviews

3.1

49% would recommend to a friend

(543 total reviews)
avatar

Paul Decker

26% approve of CEO

18% positive business outlook

Mathematica has an employee rating of 3.1 out of 5 stars, based on 543 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have a good working experience there. The Mathematica employee rating is in line with the average (within 1 standard deviation) for employers within the Management and consulting industry (3.7 stars).

Reviews by job title

543 reviews
1.0
6 Aug 2024

Unfortunate change to a toxic culture

Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Many colleagues are eager to give staff valuable opportunities and genuinely care about your career growth and well-being.

Cons

Mathematica used to be a great place to work until it turned into a toxic, mismanaged organization that cares more about profitability than the mental health and well-being of their employees. In the last few months, employees have had to fear their job security due to poor management and unsupportive leadership. Some details on this include: giving the CEO more than a half million dollar bonus and firing the staff member who revealed this by mistake, while at the same time management coerced multiple employees, many with only 3 days notice, to have their salaries cut in half by going part time because they didn’t have enough billable work and money to keep them employed full-time. Management never showed any sign of caring or responsibility for how the situation was handled and constantly tried to pretend it wasn’t happening and called the situation “a rumor”. The CEO acted as if he was going to address it at the shareholders meeting but then just went off on a tangent about “love and magic” and how employees chose to go part time for the greater good of the company, which was not a fact whatsoever. Additionally, the group of people who were made part time were referred to as “the hit list” by other colleagues. Imagine working at an organization where employees are put in such a toxic situation that colleagues are fearful they will be added to that list?

2.0
16 Apr 2025
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Mathematica used to be a place where people would go to make their careers. You are surrounded by very smart colleagues who work very hard. In general, it’s a very collegial environment with a strong supervision component help mentor early career staff.

Cons

Senior leadership is tone deaf. They are unable or unwilling to transparently communicate with the larger staff when making very important decisions that impact the entire company. Leadership is bloated and overpaid. They were utterly unprepared for dealing with the second Trump administration. The company seems to be shifting from its roots in policy research to more of a data analytics consultancy. Thus, the skill set that they value reflect that shift. Several years ago, the company articulated company, wide “values.” However with the recent downturn in policy, research and federal contracting, leadership has turned its back on these values, opting instead to protect the company, no matter the cost. These values ring very hollow now that the market has shifted.

1.0
18 Dec 2018
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Associate Director, HR who responds to the reviews Bagel Fridays

Cons

Talent comes here to die. Skill comes here to get rusty. Why? because this company lives in 1980s rather than 2018. The Assoc. Dir, HR, who so graciously took time from their busy schedule to respond to the reviews, and I seem to be working for different companies. Either that or they have been so numbed by their surroundings (senior management) that they can't tell the difference. What they said is all a big corporate speak for "I will tow the party line and if possible will put the onus on the employee." In a response to one of the reviews it was said, "Recently we have had more opportunities to work on IT projects and our staff has embraced those projects." The reality is the staff has no idea how to handle IT projects. Simple trivial tasks are over-estimated. The technology leadership has no idea it is 2018 because they are still living with FORTRAN and SAS which btw is being put in operations on a programmer laptop not even centralized servers. They are hiring external vendors to stand up internal corporate tools, while you have qualified people to do that work (and have time to do it by the way). The real IT staff you have hired, do not get pulled into the right conversations because your VPs and CTO and “Supervisors” don’t want to lose their control. In response to another review there was mention of “exciting time of change”. More like don’t know where the card will land. Even after numerous re-orgs, the key structure remains the same. Its all a matter of who knows who and not who is the best person for the job. There are senior personnel reporting to supervisor on a junior level. Mind you, this is a matrix org so the supervisor is not the task manager. Here supervisor is supposed to be a mentor to help you find your place in the organization.. Steve jobs said - It doesn't make sense to hire smart people and tell them what to do; we hire smart people so they can tell us what to do. What this company does is the exact opposite or even worse. They hire smart people and then make up stuff without their input. (External world still thinks its becaue of all the smart people they hired). Then they go in town halls and chest thump about the future and use cool jargon. Anybody remember Enron? Their town halls were full of chest thumping till the day they closed. The monthly project reviews are a farce. There is no mentoring of Project Directors. Mostly because they don’t have a clue or just care about their own fiefdom. Asking lame questions in a 15 min session does not give you the picture of the project. Coming to the, "Mathematica’s Diversity Council" Just by hiring diverse people does not stop your company from being racist. You need to embrace their difference in mannerisms which are culturally motivated. Not everyone speaks/ acts like a white person. Do you even know the ratio of non-white senior management or even Project Directors? One white project director handles multiple projects when other capable personnel are relegated to the shadows. BTW, your management does not share forward looking information or strategy. They share their past performance, and strategy decisions they have made without the employees' input. Finally to the CEO. In my years here I have yet to see him walk down the hall talking to people. Who is your company Mr. Decker? the senior managers who hold their nose high or the staff member that is prioritizing the work they do for your company, over their families, their illness, their children, their life? Why don’t you stop by the desk of a staff member and ask them how has the day been for them? What is it that you can do to make their jobs easier? Please ask your senior managers to clear their calendars and stop hiding behind pretend busy schedules. After all if they don’t work for their staff who do they work for?

Viewing 1 - 3 of 543 Reviews

Glassdoor has 598 Mathematica reviews submitted anonymously by Mathematica employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if Mathematica is right for you.