Metta School Reviews

Unempathetic HR, not compassionate at all which is ironically one of their school values

There is a deeply entrenched and increasingly undeniable pattern of bullying emanating from HR—one that is not only tolerated but quietly shielded by school leadership. Rather than acting as a neutral body safeguarding staff welfare, HR appears to operate with impunity, emboldened by a leadership team that is either unwilling or incapable of holding it accountable. What makes this situation particularly insidious is that the harm is rarely the result of a single overt incident. Instead, it unfolds through a relentless accumulation of small, calculated actions—dismissive remarks, inconsistent enforcement of policies, selective targeting, and a pervasive lack of psychological safety. Each incident, on its own, may seem trivial or deniable. Together, they form a sustained pattern of behavior that erodes morale, undermines confidence, and leaves staff in a constant state of distress. The outcome is painfully clear: capable, dedicated colleagues—individuals who once contributed meaningfully to the school community—are being driven out. Not because they lack resilience or commitment, but because the environment has become untenable. The loss is not just personal to those individuals; it is institutional. Each departure signals a failure to protect and retain talent, and a disregard for the long-term health of the organization. Compounding this issue is a troubling approach to policy-making. Decisions appear to be dictated unilaterally, often rooted in outdated perspectives that fail to reflect current realities or best practices. There is little evidence of consultation, critical reflection, or adaptability. Policies are imposed rather than developed, enforced rather than understood. This top-down rigidity not only alienates staff but also exposes a profound disconnect between leadership and the lived experiences of those on the ground. Ultimately, this is not merely a matter of poor management—it is a systemic issue that demands urgent attention. When leadership chooses protection over accountability, and control over collaboration, it fosters a culture where fear replaces trust and compliance replaces engagement. Without meaningful change, the cycle will continue: more staff will leave, morale will further deteriorate, and the institution’s credibility will steadily erode from within.